Sayta v. Martin
Filing
88
CORRECTED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. As set forth in the attached order, Mr. Sayta and Mr. Cowan are ordered to show cause (1) why Mr. Cowan should not be deemed to represent Mr. Sayta in this case before this court for all purposes, (2) why Mr. Martin& #039;s document requests and interrogatories to Mr. Sayta should not be deemed to have been properly served on Mr. Sayta via Mr. Cowan, (3) why Mr. Sayta should not be deemed to have waived all objections to Mr. Martin's document requests and in terrogatories by failing to timely serve responses and objections on Mr. Martin, and (4) why Mr. Sayta should not be compelled to produce all documents requested and respond to all interrogatories. Mr. Sayta and Mr. Cowan are each ordered to file swo rn declarations addressing the order to show cause by January 22, 2019, and are further each ordered to personally appear before the court on January 31, 2019, at 9:30 a.m. and show cause.The court vacates the debtor examination set for January 18, 2019, and grants leave for Mr. Martin to request a new examination date once the pending discovery issues have been resolved. (lblc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/17/2019)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
San Francisco Division
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
SHAUNAK SAYTA,
Case No. 16-cv-03775-LB
Plaintiff-Counterdefendant,
12
CORRECTED ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE
13
v.
14
BENNY MARTIN,
Re: ECF No. 86
Defendant-Counterclaimant.
15
16
The court entered judgments totaling $61,434.03 in favor of defendant-counterclaimant Benny
17
18
Martin and against plaintiff-counterdefendant Shaunak Sayta.1 Following judgment, on October
19
25, 2018, Mr. Sayta entered a “Substitution of Attorney” signed by himself and his new counsel,
20
John E. Cowan.2 This substitution stated that “[n]otice is hereby given that Shaunak Sayta,
21
plaintiff herein, hereby substitutes the Law Offices of John E. Cowan as his counsel of record in
22
the above-captioned matter” and did not purport to limit in any way the scope of Mr. Cowan’s
23
representation.3
24
25
26
Judgment – ECF No. 51 ($21,286.35); Judgment – ECF No. 71 ($40,147.68). Citations refer to
material in the Electronic Case File (“ECF”); pinpoint citations are to the ECF-generated page
numbers at the top of documents.
1
2
Sayta Substitution of Attorney – ECF No. 72.
3
27
Id.
28
ORDER – No. 16-cv-03775-LB
Mr. Martin states that he served post-judgment document requests and interrogatories to Mr.
1
2
Sayta on Mr. Cowan’s office on October 31, 2018.4 Mr. Martin further states that he served a
3
third-party subpoena to Mr. Cowan on November 14, 2018.5 Mr. Martin further states that neither
4
Mr. Sayta nor Mr. Cowan ever served any objections or responses to his document requests,
5
interrogatories, or subpoena.6 Instead, Mr. Cowan took the position that he represents Mr. Sayta
6
only in connection with Mr. Sayta’s appeal to the Ninth Circuit and not in connection with this
7
case in district court, and thus that service of post-judgment discovery on Mr. Sayta via Mr.
8
Cowan was improper.7 Mr. Sayta also apparently took the position that post-judgment discovery is
9
inappropriate in light of the fact that he is appealing the judgments against him.8
On December 17, 2018, Mr. Martin moved for leave to file a motion to compel.9 The court
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
denied the motion without prejudice in lieu of the meet-and-confer and joint-letter-brief
12
requirements set out in its standing order.10 In doing so, the court expressly noted that Mr. Cowan
13
had offered to meet and confer with Mr. Martin in early January 2019 about the discovery
14
disputes.11 “The court assume[d] that Mr. Cowan’s offer was made in good faith and, therefore,
15
that Mr. Cowan is authorized to represent Mr. Sayta with respect to Mr. Martin’s discovery
16
requests. On that assumption, the court denies without prejudice Mr. Martin’s motion for leave to
17
18
19
20
21
Discovery Letter Br. – ECF No. 86 at 1; Martin Interrogs. and Doc. Reqs. Proof of Service – ECF
No. 86 at 28–30.
4
23
24
25
26
5
Discovery Letter Br. – ECF No. 86 at 1; Martin Subpoena Proof of Service – ECF No. 86 at 34.
6
Discovery Letter Br. – ECF No. 86 at 1.
7
22
Id.
8
Id. Mr. Cowan raises several additional objections with respect to the subpoena directed at him,
including that it incorrectly named Mr. Cowan’s firm and seeks records protected by attorney-client
privilege. Id. at 2.
9
Martin Mot. for Leave to File Mot. to Compel – ECF No. 77.
Order – ECF No. 80.
11
27
10
Id. at 2 (quoting Martin Mot. for Leave to File Mot. to Compel Ex. I (letter) – ECF No. 77-9 at 2).
28
ORDER – No. 16-cv-03775-LB
2
1
file a motion to compel.”12 Neither Mr. Sayta nor Mr. Cowan filed anything on the docket
2
disputing that assumption.13
Mr. Martin’s counsel and Mr. Cowan subsequently met and conferred in person.14 At that meet
3
4
and confer, Mr. Cowan apparently continued to take the position that he does not represent Mr.
5
Sayta in district court and thus service of post-judgment discovery on his office was improper.
6
The court is disturbed by Mr. Sayta’s and Mr. Cowan’s apparent position that Mr. Cowan does
7
not represent Mr. Sayta in this case before this court, despite Mr. Cowan’s entering an unqualified
8
appearance on behalf of Mr. Sayta in this case before this court. The court cannot think of a basis
9
under which Mr. Cowan can enter an appearance for Mr. Sayta and then disclaim that he
10
represents Mr. Sayta, and neither Mr. Sayta nor Mr. Cowan has provided one.
The court therefore orders Mr. Sayta and Mr. Cowan to show cause (1) why Mr. Cowan
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
should not be deemed to represent Mr. Sayta in this case before this court for all purposes, (2) why
13
Mr. Martin’s document requests and interrogatories to Mr. Sayta should not be deemed to have
14
been properly served on Mr. Sayta via Mr. Cowan, (3) why Mr. Sayta should not be deemed to
15
have waived all objections to Mr. Martin’s document requests and interrogatories by failing to
16
timely serve responses and objections on Mr. Martin, and (4) why Mr. Sayta should not be
17
compelled to produce all documents requested and respond to all interrogatories. Specifically, by
18
January 22, 2019:
19
1. Mr. Sayta must file on the docket a declaration sworn under penalty of perjury listing
20
all persons who have represented him in this case before this court, the date such
21
representation began, and the date such representation ended,
22
2. Mr. Cowan must file on the docket a declaration sworn under penalty of perjury stating
23
whether he represents Mr. Sayta with respect to this case before this court and, if he
24
maintains that he does not, explaining why he signed the Substitution of Attorney filed
25
26
12
Id.
27
13
See Docket.
28
14
Discovery Letter Br. – ECF No. 1.
ORDER – No. 16-cv-03775-LB
3
1
before this court if he does not represent Mr. Sayta before this court, together with
2
citations to any authorities that support his claim that he can appear for Mr. Sayta
3
before this court and then claim that he does not represent Mr. Sayta before this court,
4
and
3. Mr. Sayta may submit a letter of not more than two single-spaced pages raising all
5
6
other arguments, together with citations to relevant authorities, that he wishes the court
7
to consider in evaluating whether the court should compel him to respond to Mr.
8
Martin’s document requests and interrogatories and overrule any objections.15
9
10
Mr. Sayta and Mr. Cowan are additionally each ordered to personally appear before the court on
January 31, 2019, at 9:30 a.m. and show cause.16
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
The court will address Mr. Martin’s motion to compel Mr. Sayta to respond to his document
12
requests and interrogatories and to compel Mr. Cowan to respond to his subpoena in conjunction
13
with this show-cause order. The court grants Mr. Martin’s request to continue the debtor
14
examination of Mr. Sayta currently set for January 18, 2019, and grants leave for Mr. Martin to
15
request a new examination date once the pending discovery issues have been resolved.
16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
18
Dated: January 17, 2019
______________________________________
LAUREL BEELER
United States Magistrate Judge
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
15
Mr. Martin may submit a written reply of not more than two single-spaced pages by January 25,
2019.
The court originally wrote that “Mr. Martin and Mr. Cowan are additionally each ordered to
personally appear before the court on January 31, 2019, at 9:30 a.m. and show cause.” Order to Show
Cause – ECF No. 87. The court meant to say that Mr. Sayta and Mr. Cowan are each ordered to
personally appear and show cause.
16
27
28
ORDER – No. 16-cv-03775-LB
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?