Mazzitti v. March of Dimes Foundation
Filing
17
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 16 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR by March of Dimes Foundation filed by March of Dimes Foundation. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on October 4, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2016)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Marguerite Mazzitti
CASE No C 3:16-cv-03781-JST
Plaintiff( s)
v.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
March of Dimes Foundation
Defendant( s)
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following
stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the
following ADR process:
11:!1
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
[J
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct
mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an
early settlement coriference with a Magistrate
Judge, you must file a Notice ofNeedfor
ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this
form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR
L.R. 3-5.
Iii Private ADR (specify process and provider)
The parties have agreed to private mediation
and are finalizing the provider and dates.
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
~
the presumptive deadline (90 days .from the date of the order referring the case to ADR,
unless otherwise ordered.)
lEI other requested deadline:
s~iff8~
Attorney
Danielle Ochs
Date: October 3, 2016
Attorney for Defendant
xx
0 IT IS SO ORDERED
0 IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS:
Date: October 4, 2016
U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE
HON. JON S. TIGAR
Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: "Stipulation & Proposed Orde~r
Selecting Mediation" or "Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE" or "Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting
Private ADR. "
Form ADR-Stip rev. 7-2016
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?