Mazzitti v. March of Dimes Foundation
Filing
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 27 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Re: Dismissal of Entire Action With Prejudice filed by March of Dimes Foundation. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on October 4, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
DANIELLE OCHS, State Bar No. 178677
danielle.ochs@ogletree.com
ZACHARY W. SHINE, State Bar No. 271522
zachary.shine@ogletree.com
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.
Steuart Tower, Suite 1300
One Market Plaza
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone:
415.442.4810
Facsimile:
415.442.4870
Attorneys for Defendant
MARCH OF DIMES FOUNDATION
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
SONYA L. SMALLETS, State Bar No. 226190
sonya@minnisandsmallets.com
AARON P. MINNIS, State Bar No. 202935
SEAN D. MCHENRY, State Bar No. 284175
MINNIS & SMALLETS LLP
369 Pine Street, Suite 500
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone:
415.551.0885
Facsimile:
415.683.7157
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MARGUERITE MAZZITTI
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
18
MARGUERITE MAZZITTI,
19
20
21
22
23
Plaintiff,
vs.
MARCH OF DIMES FOUNDATION; and
DOES 1 through 10,
Case No. 3:16-cv-03781-JST
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER RE: DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
Action Filed:
May 24, 2016
Defendants.
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 3:16-cv-03781-JST
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
1
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff Marguerite Mazzitti
2
(“Plaintiff”) and Defendant March of Dimes Foundation (“MOD”) (collectively “the Parties”), by
3
and through their respective counsel of record, stipulate and request that the entire above-captioned
4
action be dismissed with prejudice, with each side to bear its own costs and fees. The Parties
5
further stipulate and request that Judge Jon S. Tigar of the United States District Court for the
6
Northern District of California or his successor retain jurisdiction to enforce the provisions of the
7
Settlement Agreement and General Release (“Agreement”) and over any matters or actions brought
8
to enforce the Agreement.
9
10
DATED: October 4, 2017
11
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK &
STEWART, P.C.
12
13
By: /s/ Zachary W. Shine
DANIELLE OCHS
ZACHARY W. SHINE
14
15
Attorneys for Defendant
MARCH OF DIMES FOUNDATION
16
17
DATED: October 4, 2107
MINNIS & SMALLETS
18
19
20
21
22
By: /s/ Sonya L. Smallets
SONYA SMALLETS
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MARGUERITE MAZZITTI
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Case No. 3:16-cv-03781-JST
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
1
2
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this
3
document has been obtained from the other signatories.
4
DATED: October 4, 2017
5
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK &
STEWART, P.C.
6
7
8
9
10
By:
/s/ Zachary W. Shine
DANIELLE OCHS
ZACHARY W. SHINE
Attorneys for Defendant
MARCH OF DIMES FOUNDATION
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No. 3:16-cv-03781-JST
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
1
ORDER OF THE COURT
2
Pursuant to the Stipulation And [Proposed] Order by and between Plaintiff Marguerite
3
Mazzitti and Defendant March of Dimes Foundation, and good cause appearing to the Court:
4
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the matter is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety, in
5
accordance with the terms of the Stipulation. Each party shall bear its own fees and costs. This
6
Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the provisions of the Settlement Agreement and General
7
Release (“Agreement”) and Stipulaover any matters or actions brought to enforce the Agreement.
8
Marguerite Mazzitti v. March of Dimes Foundation, Case No. 3:16-cv-03781-JST, is hereby
9
dismissed.
10
IT SO ORDERED.
11
12
13
DATED: October 4, 2017
HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR
United States District Court Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Case No. 3:16-cv-03781-JST
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?