Freeman v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 31

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE [#30] RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/8/16. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2016)

1 Peter C. Freeman (State Bar No. 100744)
LAW OFFICES OF PETER C. FREEMAN
2 384 Forest Avenue Suite 23A
Laguna Beach, CA 92651
3 Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
4
Attorney for
5 NEVA FREEMAN
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11 NEVA B. FREEMAN, et al., individuals,

CASE NO.: 3:16 cv 03790 RS

12

EX PARTE STIPULATION &
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: BRIEFING
SCHEDULE ON MOTION OF
DEFENDANT QUALITY LOAN
SERVICE CORPORATION, SET FOR
HEARING ON SEPTEMBER 8, 2016

13

Plaintiffs,
v.

14 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., WELLS
FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, WELLS
15 FARGO HOME LENDING, QUALITY
LOAN SERVICE CORPORATION, and
16 DOES 1 50
17

Defendants.

18
19
20
21

The interested parties, by and through their undersigned counsel, stipulate as

22 follows:
23

Whereas, Plaintiff Neva Freeman filed and noticed a Motion to Remand and

24 Motion for Preliminary Injunction for hearing on September 1, 2016; and
25

Whereas, on July 27, 2016, Defendant Quality Loan Service Corporation filed and

26 noticed a Motion to Dismiss the claims of Plaintiff Neva Freeman on or about July 27,
27 2016, for hearing on September 8, 2016; and
28

Whereas, Defendant Wells Fargo filed its Motion to Dismiss on or about July 28,
-1CASE NO.: 3:16-CV-03790-RS
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: BRIEFING

1 2016 and set it for hearing on September 1, 2016, and
2

Whereas, on July 28, 2016, the Court continued the hearings on Plaintiff’s Motions

3 and Defendant Wells Fargo’s Motion to September 8, 2016; and
4

Whereas, by Stipulation and order thereon, the Court has altered the briefing

5 schedule for the parties in the Plaintiff’s Motions and Defendant Wells Fargo’s Motion,
6 such that the Oppositions of the parties to those motions will be due on August 18, 2016,
7 and the Replies to the same will be due on August 25, 2016; and
8

Whereas, the parties hereto desire to alter the briefing schedule for Defendant

9 Quality Loan Service Corporation to the same schedule; and
10

Whereas, no prior request has been made on these grounds and this Stipulation

11 will not impact any dates on the Court’s calendar,
12

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

13 Dated: August 5 , 2016
14
15
16
17

McCARTHY & HOLTHUS, LLP
By: /s Matthew B. Learned
Matthew B. Learned
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORPORATION

18
19 Dated: August 5, 2016
20
21
22
23

LAW OFFICES OF PETER C. FREEMAN
By: /s Peter C. Freeman
Peter C. Freeman
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
NEVA FREEMAN

24
25
26
27
28
-2CASE NO.: 3:16-CV-03790-RS
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: BRIEFING

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

2

Based on the foregoing Stipulation, and good cause appearing therefore, the

3 deadline for Plaintiff’s Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss of Defendant Quality Loan
4 Service Corporation’s is continued to August 18, 2016, and any Reply to the Opposition is
5 due on August 25, 2016.
6
8
7 Dated: August ___, 2016
8

The Honorable Richard Seeborg
United States District Judge

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3CASE NO.: 3:16-CV-03790-RS
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: BRIEFING