Cuzick v. Zodiac U.S. Seat Shells, LLC et al

Filing 26

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 25 Stipulation selecting Private ADR. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/23/2016)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA KYLE CUZICK, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated , Plaintiff(s) HSG CASE No C 3:16-cv-03793-LB STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS v. ZODIAC U.S. SEAT SHELLS, LLC, and Does 1-50, inclusive , Defendant(s) Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) Private ADR (specify process and provider) Private mediation with Steve Rottman; parties to split the mediator's fees. Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR, unless otherwise ordered. ) other requested deadline: April 26, 2017 (This was the first date the mediator had available that both parties could attend.) Date: November 21, 2016 /s/ Shaun Setareh Attorney for Plaintiff Date: November 21, 2016 /s/ Caryn F. Horner Attorney for Defendant X IT IS SO ORDERED IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS: Date: 11/23/2016 U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Private ADR.” Form ADR-Stip rev. 7-2016 American LegalNet, Inc. www FormsWorkFlo

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?