Kung v. Citibank, National Association

Filing 13

REQUEST FOR RESPONSE RE AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Alsup on 8/4/2016. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 KIN WAH KUNG, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 No. C 16-03814 WHA Plaintiff, v. REQUEST FOR RESPONSE RE AMENDED COMPLAINT CITIBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Defendant. / 15 16 In lieu of a response to defendant’s pending motion to dismiss, plaintiff filed an 17 amended complaint. By AUGUST 8, 2016, AT NOON, defendant shall please state whether the 18 motion to dismiss should be denied as moot without prejudice to a renewed motion directed at 19 the amended pleading or if it would prefer to continue with the present motion and address the 20 amendments in the reply. In either case, a new briefing schedule and hearing date will be set. 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: August 4, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?