Kung v. Citibank, National Association
Filing
13
REQUEST FOR RESPONSE RE AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Alsup on 8/4/2016. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
KIN WAH KUNG,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
No. C 16-03814 WHA
Plaintiff,
v.
REQUEST FOR RESPONSE RE
AMENDED COMPLAINT
CITIBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
Defendant.
/
15
16
In lieu of a response to defendant’s pending motion to dismiss, plaintiff filed an
17
amended complaint. By AUGUST 8, 2016, AT NOON, defendant shall please state whether the
18
motion to dismiss should be denied as moot without prejudice to a renewed motion directed at
19
the amended pleading or if it would prefer to continue with the present motion and address the
20
amendments in the reply. In either case, a new briefing schedule and hearing date will be set.
21
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: August 4, 2016.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?