Shroeder v. YRC Inc. et al
Filing
20
ORDER ON THE PARTIES' JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE FILING DATES RELATED TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS, STAY, OR TRANSFER by Hon. William Alsup granting 19 Stipulation.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
10
12
JERALD SCHROEDER on behalf of
himself, all others similarly situated, and
on behalf of the general public,
13
Plaintiffs,
14
v.
15
16
YRC INC.; YRC WORLDWIDE, INC.;
and DOES 1-100,
17
Defendants.
11
18
19
20
21
22
Case No. 16-cv-03815-WHA
Assigned for all purposes to the
Honorable William Alsup
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON THE PARTIES’
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE
FILING DATES RELATED TO
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS,
STAY OR TRANSFER
Currently before the Court is the Parties’ joint stipulation to extend the filing dates
related to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, Stay or Transfer. Good cause appearing, the Parties’
Stipulation is GRANTED, and IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff’s Opposition to
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, Stay or Transfer be filed no later than August 8, 2016; and (2)
Defendants’ Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition be filed no later than August 15, 2016.
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
July 25, 2016.
26 Date: ________________
27
By: ___________________________________
The Honorable William Alsup
United States District Court Judge
28
Case No. 16-cv-03815-WHA
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON THE PARTIES’ JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE FILING DATES
RELATED TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS, STAY OR TRANSFER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?