Hinchcliff v. St. Joseph Health et al
Filing
26
SCHEDULING ORDER AND ORDER REGARDING ADR PHONE CONFERENCE. Amended Pleadings due by 3/1/2017; Close of Fact Discovery due by 6/15/2017; Designation of Experts due by 6/29/2017; Rebuttal Reports due by 7/13/2017; Close of Expert Discover y due by 7/27/2017; Motion Hearing set for 9/7/2017 02:00 PM before Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.; Final Pretrial Conference set for 10/24/2017 03:00 PM; Jury Selection / Jury Trial (4-day) set for 11/13/2017 08:30 AM before Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam Jr. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 12/8/2016. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
KACIE HINCHCLIFF,
Case No. 16-cv-03892-HSG
Plaintiff,
8
SCHEDULING ORDER AND ORDER
REGARDING ADR PHONE
CONFERENCE
v.
9
10
ST. JOSEPH HEALTH, et al.,
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
The Court held a case management conference on December 6, 2016. The Court enters the
12
13
following case schedule.
14
Event
Deadline to Amend Pleadings
Close of Fact Discovery
Exchange of Opening Expert Reports
Exchange of Rebuttal Expert Reports
Close of Expert Discovery
Last Day to Hear Dispositive Motions
Pretrial Conference
Jury Trial
15
16
17
18
19
Deadline
March 1, 2017
June 15, 2017
June 29, 2017
July 13, 2017
July 27, 2017
September 7, 2017 at 2:00 pm
October 24, 2017 at 3:00 pm
November 13, 2017 at 8:30am - 4 days
20
These dates may only be altered by order of the Court and only upon a showing of good cause.
21
The parties are directed to review and comply with this Court’s Civil Pretrial and Trial Standing
22
Order.
23
24
25
26
27
28
The Court further DIRECTS the parties to contact the ADR department to schedule an
ADR phone conference, if they have not already done so.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 12/8/2016
______________________________________
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?