Hinchcliff v. St. Joseph Health et al

Filing 26

SCHEDULING ORDER AND ORDER REGARDING ADR PHONE CONFERENCE. Amended Pleadings due by 3/1/2017; Close of Fact Discovery due by 6/15/2017; Designation of Experts due by 6/29/2017; Rebuttal Reports due by 7/13/2017; Close of Expert Discover y due by 7/27/2017; Motion Hearing set for 9/7/2017 02:00 PM before Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.; Final Pretrial Conference set for 10/24/2017 03:00 PM; Jury Selection / Jury Trial (4-day) set for 11/13/2017 08:30 AM before Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam Jr. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 12/8/2016. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 KACIE HINCHCLIFF, Case No. 16-cv-03892-HSG Plaintiff, 8 SCHEDULING ORDER AND ORDER REGARDING ADR PHONE CONFERENCE v. 9 10 ST. JOSEPH HEALTH, et al., Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 The Court held a case management conference on December 6, 2016. The Court enters the 12 13 following case schedule. 14 Event Deadline to Amend Pleadings Close of Fact Discovery Exchange of Opening Expert Reports Exchange of Rebuttal Expert Reports Close of Expert Discovery Last Day to Hear Dispositive Motions Pretrial Conference Jury Trial 15 16 17 18 19 Deadline March 1, 2017 June 15, 2017 June 29, 2017 July 13, 2017 July 27, 2017 September 7, 2017 at 2:00 pm October 24, 2017 at 3:00 pm November 13, 2017 at 8:30am - 4 days 20 These dates may only be altered by order of the Court and only upon a showing of good cause. 21 The parties are directed to review and comply with this Court’s Civil Pretrial and Trial Standing 22 Order. 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Court further DIRECTS the parties to contact the ADR department to schedule an ADR phone conference, if they have not already done so. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 12/8/2016 ______________________________________ HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?