Caponio v. Boilermakers Local 549 et al

Filing 27

ORDER GRANTING IN PART 26 STIPULATION. Initial Case Management Conference remains set for 11/22/2016 01:30 PM in Courtroom 4, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Case Management Statement due by 11/15/2016. Motions due by 11/8/2016. Responses due by 12/6/2016. Replies due by 12/20/2016. Motion Hearing set for 1/26/2017 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Vince Chhabria. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 10/19/2016. (vclc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 BRYAN SCHWARTZ (SBN 209903) LOGAN TALBOT (SBN 300591) Bryan Schwartz Law 1330 Broadway, Suite 1630 Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: 510-444-9301 Email: bryan@bryanschwartzlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Teresa Caponio JASON R. MCCLITIS Blake & Uhlig, P.A. 753 State Ave., Ste. 475 Kansas City, KS 66101 Tel: 913-321-8884 Fax: 913-321-2396 jrm@blake-uhlig.com Admitted Pro Hac Vice Attorneys for Defendants Boilermakers Western States Joint Apprenticeship Program and International Brotherhood of Boilermakers Additional counsel listed on following page 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 TERESA CAPONIO, 16 Plaintiff, 17 vs. 18 BOILERMAKERS LODGE 549; BOILERMAKERS WESTERN STATES JOINT APPRENTICESHIP PROGRAM; and INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF BOILERMAKERS, Case Number: 16-cv-3919-VC 19 20 21 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINES FOR MOTION TO DISMISS BRIEFING Complaint Filed: July 12, 2016 Amended Complaint Filed: October 5, 2016 22 Defendants. 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND BRIEFING DEADLINES Case No. 16-cv-3919 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 DAVID ROSENFELD CONCHITA LOZANO-BATISTA ANNE I. YEN WEINBERG, ROGER & ROSENFELD A Professional Corporation 1001 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 200 Alameda, California 94501 Telephone (510) 337-1001 Fax (510) 337-1023 drosenfeld@unioncounsel.net clozano@unioncounsel.net ayen@unioncounsel.net 8 9 10 Attorneys for Defendants Boilermakers Local 549 And co-counsel for Boilermakers Western States Joint Apprenticeship Program and International Brotherhood of Boilermakers 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND BRIEFING DEADLINES Case No. 16-cv-3919 2 1 Pursuant to United States District Court, Northern District of California Local Rule 6-2, 2 the following Stipulation is entered into by Plaintiff TERESA CAPONIO (“Plaintiff”) and 3 Defendants BOILERMAKERS LODGE 549, BOILERMAKERS WESTERN STATES 4 JOINT APPRENTICESHIP PROGRAM and INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF 5 BOILERMAKERS (“Defendants”) (collectively, the “Parties”) by and through their counsel of 6 record: 7 WHEREAS, Defendants have filed Motions to Dismiss with prejudice; 8 WHEREAS, the Motions to Dismiss were noticed to be heard on November 10, 2016; 9 WHEREAS, the Court set the Case Management Conference on November 22, 2016; 10 WHEREAS, on October 5, 2016, Plaintiff filed her Amended Complaint; 11 WHEREAS, based upon professional courtesy, and suffering no prejudice, Plaintiff and 12 Defendants have agreed to the following deadlines for briefing for to-be-filed renewed motions 13 to dismiss to the Amended Complaint: Defendants’ Renewed Motions to Dismiss to be filed by 14 November 8, 2016; Plaintiff’s Opposition by December 6, 2016; Defendants’ Reply in Support 15 by December 20, 2016; and 16 WHEREAS Defendants are canceling the hearing on the currently pending Motions to 17 Dismiss, scheduled for November 10, 2016 and will notice the Renewed Motions to Dismiss to 18 be heard on January 26, 2017; 19 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AS FOLLOWS: 20 The Parties respectfully request the Court cancel the November 10, 2016 hearing date on 21 the currently pending Motions to Dismiss, and continue the Case Management Conference 22 currently set for November 22, 2016 to January 26, 2017, to coincide with the anticipated motion 23 hearing; or if that date is improper for a case management conference, on the earliest available 24 date thereafter, January 31, 2017. 25 26 The Parties further respectfully request that the Court permit the following deadlines for briefing for to-be-filed renewed motions to dismiss to the Amended Complaint: Defendants’ 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND BRIEFING DEADLINES Case No. 16-cv-3919 3 1 Renewed Motions to Dismiss to be filed by November 8, 2016; Plaintiff’s Opposition by 2 December 6, 2016; Defendants’ Reply in Support by December 20, 2016. 3 4 Dated: October ____, 2016 Respectfully Submitted, 5 /s/ Jason R. McClitis 6 10 JASON R. MCCLITIS Blake & Uhlig, P.A. 753 State Ave., Ste. 475 Kansas City, KS 66101 Tel: 913-321-8884 Fax: 913-321-2396 jrm@blake-uhlig.com Admitted Pro Hac Vice 11 /s/Anne I. Yen 12 DAVID ROSENFELD CONCHITA LOZANO-BATISTA ANNE I. YEN WEINBERG, ROGER & ROSENFELD A Professional Corporation 1001 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 200 Alameda, California 94501 Telephone (510) 337-1001 Fax (510) 337-1023 drosenfeld@unioncounsel.net clozano@unioncounsel.net ayen@unioncounsel.net 7 8 9 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 /s/ Bryan Schwartz 21 BRYAN SCHWARTZ LOGAN TALBOT Bryan Schwartz Law 1330 Broadway Suite 1630 Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: 510-444-9301 Email: bryan@bryanschwartzlaw.com 22 23 24 25 26 Attorneys for Plaintiff Teresa Caponio 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND BRIEFING DEADLINES Case No. 16-cv-3919 4 [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 3 PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 Dated: October 19 , 2016 6 7 ____________ HON. VINCE CHHABRIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND BRIEFING DEADLINES Case No. 16-cv-3919 5 141678\886301

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?