Crago v. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. et al

Filing 100

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 99 TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT. Initial Case Management Conference previously set for 12/14/2017 continued to 1/25/2018 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Case Management Statement Due 1/18/2018. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 12/7/17. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP GILBERT R. SEROTA (SBN 75305) gilbert.serota@apks.com JEE YOUNG YOU (SBN 241658) jeeyoungyou@apks.com Three Embarcadero Center, 10th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-4024 Telephone: (415) 471-3170 Facsimile: (415) 471-3400 LOWELL HAKY (SBN 178526) Vice President and Associate General Counsel MAI KLAASSEN (SBN 209546) Vice President and Associate General Counsel CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC. 211 Main Street San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 471-3100 Facsimile: (415) 471-3400 Attorneys for Defendants CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC. and THE CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 ROBERT CRAGO, Individually And On Behalf Of All Others Similarly Situated, 16 17 18 19 20 Case No. 3:16-cv-3938-RS CLASS ACTION ORDER Plaintiff, STIPULATION TO (1) CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND (2) EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT v. CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC., and THE CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION, Defendants. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, Defendants Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. and The Charles Schwab Corporation (“Defendants” or “Schwab”) and Lead Plaintiffs Robert Wolfson and Frank Pino (“Lead Plaintiffs”; collectively the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, for good cause, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, on December 5, 2017, this Court issued an Order Denying Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint (“Order,” ECF 98); -1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 16-cv-3938-RS WHEREAS, the initial case management conference (“CMC”) is currently scheduled for 1 2 December 14, 2017, at 10:00 a.m., and the CMC statement is due on December 7, 2017 (ECF 77); WHEREAS, lead counsel for Schwab has been in arbitration this week, and is expected to 3 4 5 be in arbitration through December 8, 2017, thus the parties are unable to meaningfully meet and confer prior to the December 7, 2017 deadline to file the CMC statement; WHEREAS, the Parties agree that additional time to confer regarding the case schedule, 6 7 8 ADR processes, and the CMC statement is necessary in the interest of judicial efficiency, administration and justice, as well as conservation of judicial and private resources; WHEREAS, the current deadline for Defendants to respond to the Second Amended 9 10 Complaint (“SAC”) is December 19, 2017; WHEREAS, due to previously-scheduled deadlines and obligations, Defendants have 11 12 requested and Plaintiffs have agreed to an additional 30 days for Defendants to respond to the SAC; WHEREAS, the Parties have previously requested and were granted extensions of time to 13 14 15 16 respond to the complaint and requested to continue the initial case management conference (ECF 23, 39, 76), and the changes requested herein will not alter the date of any deadlines already fixed by Court order, as this Court has yet to schedule pre-trial and trial dates. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED BY AND AGREED AMONG THE PARTIES, 17 18 19 SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THIS COURT, by these parties through their respective counsel of record, as follows: 1. Schwab’s deadline to file its response to the Second Amended Complaint will be 20 January 12, 2018; 21 2. The initial Case Management Conference will be continued to January 25, 2018, or 22 another date no earlier than January 25, 2018, as determined by this Court. 23 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 -2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 16-cv-3938-RS 1 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 2 3 Dated: December 7, 2017 ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP 4 By: 5 6 7 8 9 /s/ Jee Young You Gilbert R. Serota Jee Young You gilbert.serota@apks.com jeeyoungyou@apks.com Three Embarcadero Center, 10th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-4024 Telephone: (415) 471-3170 Facsimile: (415) 471-3400 Attorneys for Defendants 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Dated: December 7, 2017 GLANCY PRONGAY & MURRAY LLP By: /s/ Joshua L. Crowell Joshua L. Crowell (#295411) 1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100 Los Angeles, California 90067 Telephone: (310) 201-9150 Facsimile: (310) 201-9160 Email: jcrowell@glancylaw.com Co-Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs and the Class BRAGAR EAGEL & SQUIRE, P.C. 20 21 22 23 24 25 By: /s/ David J. Stone David J. Stone 885 Third Avenue, Suite 3040 New York, New York 10022 Telephone: (212) 308-5858 Facsimile: (212) 486-0462 stone@bespc.com Co-Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs and the Class 26 27 28 -3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 16-cv-3938-RS 1 ATTESTATION 2 3 4 5 I, Jee Young You, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file this STIPULATION TO (1) CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND (2) EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT. In 6 compliance with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that Counsel for Defendants concur in this 7 filing. 8 9 DATED: December 7, 2017 /s/ Jee Young You JEE YOUNG YOU 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 16-cv-3938-RS [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED BY AND AGREED AMONG THE PARTIES: 1. Schwab’s deadline to file its response to the Second Amended Complaint will be January 12, 2018; 2. The initial Case Management Conference will be continued to January 25, 2018, or another date no earlier than January 25, 2018, as determined by this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 DATED: 12/7/17 Hon. Richard Seeborg U.S. District Court Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -5- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 16-cv-3938-RS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?