Crago v. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. et al
Filing
100
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 99 TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT. Initial Case Management Conference previously set for 12/14/2017 continued to 1/25/2018 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Case Management Statement Due 1/18/2018. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 12/7/17. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP
GILBERT R. SEROTA (SBN 75305)
gilbert.serota@apks.com
JEE YOUNG YOU (SBN 241658)
jeeyoungyou@apks.com
Three Embarcadero Center, 10th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-4024
Telephone: (415) 471-3170
Facsimile: (415) 471-3400
LOWELL HAKY (SBN 178526)
Vice President and Associate General Counsel
MAI KLAASSEN (SBN 209546)
Vice President and Associate General Counsel
CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC.
211 Main Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: (415) 471-3100
Facsimile: (415) 471-3400
Attorneys for Defendants CHARLES SCHWAB & CO.,
INC. and THE CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
15
ROBERT CRAGO, Individually And On Behalf
Of All Others Similarly Situated,
16
17
18
19
20
Case No. 3:16-cv-3938-RS
CLASS ACTION
ORDER
Plaintiff,
STIPULATION TO (1) CONTINUE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND (2)
EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
v.
CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC., and THE
CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION,
Defendants.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, Defendants Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. and The Charles
Schwab Corporation (“Defendants” or “Schwab”) and Lead Plaintiffs Robert Wolfson and Frank
Pino (“Lead Plaintiffs”; collectively the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, for
good cause, hereby stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, on December 5, 2017, this Court issued an Order Denying Defendants’ Motion
to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint (“Order,” ECF 98);
-1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 16-cv-3938-RS
WHEREAS, the initial case management conference (“CMC”) is currently scheduled for
1
2
December 14, 2017, at 10:00 a.m., and the CMC statement is due on December 7, 2017 (ECF 77);
WHEREAS, lead counsel for Schwab has been in arbitration this week, and is expected to
3
4
5
be in arbitration through December 8, 2017, thus the parties are unable to meaningfully meet and
confer prior to the December 7, 2017 deadline to file the CMC statement;
WHEREAS, the Parties agree that additional time to confer regarding the case schedule,
6
7
8
ADR processes, and the CMC statement is necessary in the interest of judicial efficiency,
administration and justice, as well as conservation of judicial and private resources;
WHEREAS, the current deadline for Defendants to respond to the Second Amended
9
10
Complaint (“SAC”) is December 19, 2017;
WHEREAS, due to previously-scheduled deadlines and obligations, Defendants have
11
12
requested and Plaintiffs have agreed to an additional 30 days for Defendants to respond to the SAC;
WHEREAS, the Parties have previously requested and were granted extensions of time to
13
14
15
16
respond to the complaint and requested to continue the initial case management conference (ECF
23, 39, 76), and the changes requested herein will not alter the date of any deadlines already fixed
by Court order, as this Court has yet to schedule pre-trial and trial dates.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED BY AND AGREED AMONG THE PARTIES,
17
18
19
SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THIS COURT, by these parties through their respective counsel of
record, as follows:
1. Schwab’s deadline to file its response to the Second Amended Complaint will be
20
January 12, 2018;
21
2. The initial Case Management Conference will be continued to January 25, 2018, or
22
another date no earlier than January 25, 2018, as determined by this Court.
23
24
//
25
//
26
//
27
//
28
-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 16-cv-3938-RS
1
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
2
3
Dated: December 7, 2017
ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP
4
By:
5
6
7
8
9
/s/ Jee Young You
Gilbert R. Serota
Jee Young You
gilbert.serota@apks.com
jeeyoungyou@apks.com
Three Embarcadero Center, 10th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-4024
Telephone: (415) 471-3170
Facsimile: (415) 471-3400
Attorneys for Defendants
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Dated: December 7, 2017
GLANCY PRONGAY & MURRAY LLP
By: /s/ Joshua L. Crowell
Joshua L. Crowell (#295411)
1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100
Los Angeles, California 90067
Telephone: (310) 201-9150
Facsimile: (310) 201-9160
Email: jcrowell@glancylaw.com
Co-Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs and
the Class
BRAGAR EAGEL & SQUIRE, P.C.
20
21
22
23
24
25
By:
/s/ David J. Stone
David J. Stone
885 Third Avenue, Suite 3040
New York, New York 10022
Telephone: (212) 308-5858
Facsimile: (212) 486-0462
stone@bespc.com
Co-Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs and
the Class
26
27
28
-3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 16-cv-3938-RS
1
ATTESTATION
2
3
4
5
I, Jee Young You, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to
file this STIPULATION TO (1) CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND
(2) EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT.
In
6
compliance with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that Counsel for Defendants concur in this
7
filing.
8
9
DATED: December 7, 2017
/s/ Jee Young You
JEE YOUNG YOU
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4-
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 16-cv-3938-RS
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED BY AND AGREED AMONG THE PARTIES:
1. Schwab’s deadline to file its response to the Second Amended Complaint will be
January 12, 2018;
2. The initial Case Management Conference will be continued to January 25, 2018, or
another date no earlier than January 25, 2018, as determined by this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
DATED: 12/7/17
Hon. Richard Seeborg
U.S. District Court Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-5-
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 16-cv-3938-RS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?