Aparicio v. Comcast Cable Communications Management LLC

Filing 23

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 22 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Extending ADR Deadline filed by Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on December 16, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2016)

Download PDF
Case 3:16-cv-03952-JST Document 22 Filed 12/14/16 Page 1 of 5 1 Mark S. Spring, State Bar No. 155114 mspring@cdflaborlaw.com 2 Nicole A. Legrottaglie, State Bar No. 271416 nlegrottaglie@cdflaborlaw.com 3 CAROTHERS DISANTE & FREUDENBERGER LLP 900 University Avenue 4 Suite 200 Sacramento, California 95825 5 Telephone: (916) 361-0991 Facsimile: (916) 570-1958 6 Attorneys for Defendant 7 COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC erroneously sued as COMCAST 8 INC, dba COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC, COMCAST CABLE 9 COMMUNICATIONS LLC, COMCAST HOLDINGS CORPORATION, and COMCAST CORPORATION 10 11 Daniel Ray Bacon, State Bar No. 103866 bacondr@aol.com 12 J. Philip Martin, State Bar No. 55100 LAW OFFICES OF DANIEL RAY BACON 13 234 Van Ness Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102 14 Telephone: (415) 864-0907 Facsimile: (415) 864-0989 15 Attorneys for Plaintiff 16 JORGE F. APARICIO 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 20 JORGE F. APARICIO, 21 vs. 22 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, COMCAST INC, doing business as COMCAST 23 CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC, COMCAST CABLE 24 COMMUNICATIONS LLC, COMCAST HOLDINGS CORPORATION, and COMCAST 25 CORPORATION a Pennsylvania Corporation, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 26 Defendants. 27 Case No. 3:16-cv-03952-JST JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING ADR DEADLINE Action Filed: March 23, 2016 Trial Date: August 7, 2017 28 1 CAROTHERS DiSANTE & FREUDENBERGER LLP 1154814.1 JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING ADR DEADLINE Case 3:16-cv-03952-JST Document 22 Filed 12/14/16 Page 2 of 5 This Joint Stipulation extending the ADR deadline is entered into between Plaintiff Jorge F. 1 2 Aparicio, on the one hand, and Defendant Comcast Communications Management, LLC on the 3 other hand, through their respective counsel of record, with reference to the following facts: 1. WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred regarding ADR and submitted a 4 5 stipulation agreeing to participate in mediation pursuant to ADR Local Rule 6. The Parties further 6 agreed to hold the mediation by the presumptive deadline of 90 days from the date of the Court’s 7 order referring the case to ADR. The Court granted the Parties’ stipulation on September 29, 2016. 2. WHEREAS, the Parties have conferred with the court-appointed mediator and have 8 9 agreed that additional time is necessary to conduct initial discovery and depositions in order to 10 have a fruitful mediation. 3. WHEREAS, Plaintiff also desires the extension because the Parties are awaiting the 11 12 resolution of the grievance of Plaintiff’s termination through Plaintiff’s union which is still 13 pending. 4. WHEREAS, Comcast does not believe that the pending grievance between the 14 15 Communications Workers of America and Comcast has anything to do with the ADR process in 16 this case and does not believe that it constitutes valid grounds for altering any dates, including the 17 ADR deadline, in this litigation. Nevertheless, Comcast desires additional time to conduct 18 discovery prior to mediation. 5. WHEREAS, the Parties agree to hold the ADR session on or before May 5, 2017. 19 20 NOW, THEREFORE, based on the foregoing, the Parties agree and are stipulating herein, 21 22 subject to the Court’s approval, to hold the ADR session on or before May 5, 2017. 23 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 24 25 26 27 /// 28 /// 2 CAROTHERS DiSANTE & FREUDENBERGER LLP 1154814.1 JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING ADR DEADLINE Case 3:16-cv-03952-JST Document 22 Filed 12/14/16 Page 3 of 5 1 Dated: December 14, 2016 CAROTHERS DISANTE & FREUDENBERGER LLP 2 By: /s/ Nicole A. Legrottaglie Nicole A. Legrottaglie Attorneys for Defendant COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC 3 4 5 6 7 Dated: December 14, 2016 8 LAW OFFICES OF DANIEL BACON By: /s/ Daniel Ray Bacon Daniel Ray Bacon Attorneys for Plaintiff Jorge F. Aparicio 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 CAROTHERS DiSANTE & FREUDENBERGER LLP 1154814.1 JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING ADR DEADLINE Case 3:16-cv-03952-JST Document 22 Filed 12/14/16 Page 4 of 5 1 LOCAL RULE 5-1 ATTESTATION In accordance with U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Civil Local 2 3 Rile 5-1 (i)(3), the filing attorney attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been 4 obtained from each of the other Signatories, which shall serve in lieu of their signatures on the 5 document. The filing attorney will maintain records to support this concurrence for subsequent 6 production for the Court, if so ordered, or for inspection upon request by a party, until one year 7 after the final resolution of the action (including appeal, if any). 8 9 Dated: December 14, 2016 CAROTHERS DISANTE & FREUDENBERGER LLP 10 By: /s/ Nicole A. Legrottaglie Nicole A. Legrottaglie Attorneys for Defendant COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC erroneously sued as COMCAST INC, dba COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC, COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS LLC, COMCAST HOLDINGS CORPORATION, and COMCAST CORPORATION 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 CAROTHERS DiSANTE & FREUDENBERGER LLP 1154814.1 JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING ADR DEADLINE Case 3:16-cv-03952-JST Document 22 Filed 12/14/16 Page 5 of 5 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 ☐ X ☐ 3 4 5 6 7 The Parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. The Parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 15, 2016 8 By: 9 10 JON S. TIGAR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5 CAROTHERS DiSANTE & FREUDENBERGER LLP 1154814.1 JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING ADR DEADLINE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?