Brett v. Mark, et al

Filing 18

ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 05/01/2017. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 FRANK BRETT, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Case No. 3:16-cv-03999-WHO ORDER DISMISSING FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE v. Re: Dkt. No. 17 MARK, et al., Defendants. 12 13 On December 9, 2016, I adopted Chief Magistrate Judge Spero’s Report and 14 Recommendation and dismissed the complaint with leave to amend pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 15 1915(e). Dkt. No. 17. More than four months have passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended 16 complaint. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41(b) 17 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 18 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 1, 2017 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 William H. Orrick United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?