Brett v. Mark, et al
ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 05/01/2017. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2017)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 3:16-cv-03999-WHO
ORDER DISMISSING FOR FAILURE
Re: Dkt. No. 17
MARK, et al.,
On December 9, 2016, I adopted Chief Magistrate Judge Spero’s Report and
Recommendation and dismissed the complaint with leave to amend pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
1915(e). Dkt. No. 17. More than four months have passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended
complaint. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41(b)
of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 1, 2017
William H. Orrick
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?