Vista Energy Marketing, LP v. Pacific Gas & Electric Company et al

Filing 25

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 20 Stipulation Establishing Briefing Schedule. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 VISTA ENERGY MARKETING, LP, 13 14 15 16 17 18 Plaintiff, vs. PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, a California corporation; ALBERT TORRES, an individual; BILL CHEN, an individual; TANISHA ROBINSON, an individual, Defendants. CASE NO. 3:16-CV-04019-HSG ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION ESTABLISHING BRIEFING SCHEDULE Action Filed: July 15, 2016 Response date: September 22, 2016 [Joint Stipulation Establishing Briefing Schedule and Declaration of Dennis S. Ellis filed concurrently herewith] 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 3:16-CV-04019-HSG [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: STIPULATION 1 2 ORDER REGARDING JOINT STIPULATION The Joint Stipulation Establishing Briefing Schedule (“Joint Stipulation”), agreed to by 3 Plaintiff Vista Energy Marketing, LP (“Vista Energy”) and Defendants Pacific Gas and Electric 4 Company (“PG&E”), Albert Torres, Bill Chen, and Tanisha Robinson (collectively, 5 “Defendants”), was submitted for Court approval on August 23, 2016. Having considered the 6 Joint Stipulation, all other pleadings and papers on file in this Action, and for good cause 7 appearing therefore, 8 9 10 11 12 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The deadline for Vista Energy to oppose Defendants’ answer or response is October 20, 2016; and 2. The deadline for Defendants to reply to Vista Energy’s opposition is November 3, 2016. 13 14 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED this 24th day of August, 2016. 15 By: 16 The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam Jr. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 3:16-CV-04019-HSG -1- [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: STIPULATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?