Brown v. Colvin
Filing
27
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 26 for extension of time for Plaintiff to file optional response brief filed by Diane Yvonne Brown. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/20/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2017)
Case 3:16-cv-04022-EMC Document 26 Filed 06/13/17 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
Geri N. Kahn (State Bar Number 148536)
geri@gerinkahn.com
Law Office of Geri N. Kahn
465 California Street, Suite 609
San Francisco, CA 94104
Tel. (415) 397-5446
Fax (800) 375-5956
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Diane Yvonne Brown
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
Diane Yvonne Brown,
12
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
Case No. 16-cv-04022-EMC
Stipulation of time for Plaintiff to file optional
Response Brief in Support of Motion for
Summary Judgment; [Proposed Order]
Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social
Security Administration,
15
Defendant.
16
17
18
19
20
21
Plaintiff, by and through his attorney of record, and Defendant, by and through her attorney of
record, hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court, to a 14-day extension of time for Plaintiff’s
counsel to file a response brief in support of her Motion for Summary Judgment, in light of the
following:
1.
22
23
sufficient time to finish the response brief.
2.
24
Plaintiff’s counsel has emailed Richard Rodriguez, Esq. defendant’s counsel. Mr.
Rodriguez has indicated that he will not object to the request for a 14 day extension of
25
26
Plaintiff’s counsel has had other cases with pressing deadlines and has not yet had
time for counsel to prepare her brief.
3.
Should the request be granted, Plaintiff’s brief will be due on June 27, 2017.
27
28
Case No. 16-cv-04022-EMC
1
STIPULATION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPTIONAL RESPONSE BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; [PROPOSED ORDER]
Case 3:16-cv-04022-EMC Document 26 Filed 06/13/17 Page 2 of 2
1
2
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: June 13, 2017
/s/ Geri N. Kahn
GERI N. KAHN
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated: June 13, 2017
/s/ Richard Rodriguez
RICHARD RODRIGUEZ
Special Assistant United States Attorney
(*By email authorization on June 13, 2017)
3
4
5
7
8
ORDER
Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.
RT
ORDERED
Judge Edward
H
M. Chen
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
LI
N
R NIA
FO
S
UNIT
ED
NO
ER
RT
U
O
17
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
IT IS SO
ER
A
H
16
Chen
Edward dge Chenrd M.
M. Edwa
J States Magistrate Judge
Unitedu
RT
15
DERED
O OR
IT IS S
NO
14
6/20/17
R NIA
13
Dated:
FO
12
UNIT
ED
11
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
S
10
LI
9
A
6
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 16-cv-04022-EMC
2
STIPULATION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPTIONAL RESPONSE BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; [PROPOSED ORDER]
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?