Brown v. Colvin

Filing 27

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 26 for extension of time for Plaintiff to file optional response brief filed by Diane Yvonne Brown. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/20/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2017)

Download PDF
Case 3:16-cv-04022-EMC Document 26 Filed 06/13/17 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 Geri N. Kahn (State Bar Number 148536) geri@gerinkahn.com Law Office of Geri N. Kahn 465 California Street, Suite 609 San Francisco, CA 94104 Tel. (415) 397-5446 Fax (800) 375-5956 Attorneys for Plaintiff Diane Yvonne Brown 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Diane Yvonne Brown, 12 Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 Case No. 16-cv-04022-EMC Stipulation of time for Plaintiff to file optional Response Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment; [Proposed Order] Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 19 20 21 Plaintiff, by and through his attorney of record, and Defendant, by and through her attorney of record, hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court, to a 14-day extension of time for Plaintiff’s counsel to file a response brief in support of her Motion for Summary Judgment, in light of the following: 1. 22 23 sufficient time to finish the response brief. 2. 24 Plaintiff’s counsel has emailed Richard Rodriguez, Esq. defendant’s counsel. Mr. Rodriguez has indicated that he will not object to the request for a 14 day extension of 25 26 Plaintiff’s counsel has had other cases with pressing deadlines and has not yet had time for counsel to prepare her brief. 3. Should the request be granted, Plaintiff’s brief will be due on June 27, 2017. 27 28 Case No. 16-cv-04022-EMC 1 STIPULATION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPTIONAL RESPONSE BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; [PROPOSED ORDER] Case 3:16-cv-04022-EMC Document 26 Filed 06/13/17 Page 2 of 2 1 2 Respectfully submitted, Dated: June 13, 2017 /s/ Geri N. Kahn GERI N. KAHN Attorney for Plaintiff Dated: June 13, 2017 /s/ Richard Rodriguez RICHARD RODRIGUEZ Special Assistant United States Attorney (*By email authorization on June 13, 2017) 3 4 5 7 8 ORDER Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. RT ORDERED Judge Edward H M. Chen F D IS T IC T O R C LI N R NIA FO S UNIT ED NO ER RT U O 17 S DISTRICT TE C TA IT IS SO ER A H 16 Chen Edward dge Chenrd M. M. Edwa J States Magistrate Judge Unitedu RT 15 DERED O OR IT IS S NO 14 6/20/17 R NIA 13 Dated: FO 12 UNIT ED 11 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S 10 LI 9 A 6 N D IS T IC T R OF C 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 16-cv-04022-EMC 2 STIPULATION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPTIONAL RESPONSE BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; [PROPOSED ORDER]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?