Nand et al v. Specialized Portfolio Servicing Inc., et al
Filing
53
SIPULATION AND ORDER as to 20 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint and 51 to Continue Motion to Dismiss Hearing and Case Management Conference: Initial Case Management Conference reset for 2/16/2017 at 01:30 PM in Court room 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Case Management Statement due by 2/9/2017. Motion Hearing re: 20 Motion to Dismiss reset for 2/16/2017 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Edward M. Chen. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/20/2017. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Matthew Mellen (SBN: 233350)
Jessica Galletta (SBN: 281179)
MELLEN LAW FIRM
One Embarcadero Center, Fifth Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 315-1653
Facsimile: (415) 276-1902
Attorneys for Plaintiffs,
EVELYN NAND
SUKHANDRA NAND
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
EVELYN NAND, an individual;
SUKHANDRA NAND, an individual
Case No. 3:16-cv-04030-EMC
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
HEARING DATES ON DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO DISMISS AND CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Plaintiffs,
v.
SPECIALIZED PORTFOLIO SERVICING,
INC., a business entity; NATIONAL
DEFAULT SERVICING CORPORATION, a
business entity; and DOES 1 through 50,
inclusive
Complaint Filed: July 18, 2016
Defendants.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARINGS
AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE
-1-
1
TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
2
Plaintiffs Evelyn Nand and Sukhandra Nand (collectively "Plaintiffs") and Defendants
3
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (erroneously sued as Specialized Portfolio Servicing, Inc.)
4
(“SPS”) and National Default Servicing Corporation (“NDSC,” collectively “Defendants”), by
5
and through their counsel of record, hereby respectfully submit this stipulated request for a short
6
continuance of the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and Case Management Conference,
7
both currently scheduled for February 3, 2017.
8
On July 18, 2016, Plaintiffs filed this action. ECF No. 1.
9
On August 9, 2016, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint, with a hearing
10
11
date of September 15, 2016. ECF No. 20.
On August 19, 2016 the parties submitted a Stipulation and Proposed Order continuing the
12
haring on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and related filing deadlines. ECF No. 23. Pursuant to
13
the Stipulation, as amended by the Court, the hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary
14
injunction and Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss was continued to November 3, 2016.
15
On October 5, 2016 the parties submitted a Stipulation and Proposed Order continuing the
16
haring on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and related filing deadlines. ECF No. 29. Pursuant to
17
the Stipulation, as amended by the Court, the hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary
18
injunction and Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss was continued to December 15, 2016. ECF No. 30
19
On November 29, 2016, the parties submitted a Stipulation and Proposed Order
20
continuing the haring on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and related filing deadlines. ECF No. 34.
21
Pursuant to the Stipulation, as amended by the Court, the hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion for
22
preliminary injunction and Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss was continued to January 26, 2017.
23
ECF No. 35.
24
25
26
27
On January 10, 2017, the Court continued the hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss
and the Case Management Conference until January 27, 2017. ECF. No. 40.
On January 17, 2017, the Court continued the hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss
and the Case Management Conference until February 3, 2017. ECF. No. 46.
28
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARINGS
AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE
-2-
1
2
3
4
5
On January 18, 2017, the Court issued an Order requiring personal appearance by the
Parties at the hearings scheduled for February 3, 2017. ECF Nos. 48-49.
On January 19, 2017, the Parties stipulated and agreed to withdrawal of Plaintiffs’ Motion
for Preliminary Injunction, without prejudice. ECF. 50.
Based on the foregoing and the Court’s requirement for personal appearance at the hearing
6
on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and the Case Management Conference, the Parties stipulate
7
and agree, at Plaintiffs’ request, to continue the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and
8
the Case Management Conference until February 16, 2017 in order to allow all counsel to
9
personally appear at the hearings.
10
11
Plaintiffs and Defendants so stipulate.
DATED: January 19, 2017
STOEL RIVES LLP
12
By: /s/ Bryan L. Hawkins
THOMAS A. WOODS
BRYAN L. HAWKINS
Attorneys for Defendants
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
(erroneously sued as Specialized Portfolio
Servicing, Inc.) and National Default
Servicing Corporation
13
14
15
16
17
18
DATED: January 19, 2017
MELLEN LAW FIRM
19
By: /s/ Jessica Galletta
JESSICA GALLETTA
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
20
EVELYN NAND and SUKHANDRA NAND
21
22
23
ATTESTATION OF SIGNATURE:
I attest under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that I have
24
received the concurrence in the filing of this document from the listed signatories as
25
required by Local Rule 5.1(i)(3).
26
Dated: August 19, 2016
/s/ Jessica Galletta
JESSICA GALLETTA
27
28
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARINGS
AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE
-3-
1
ORDER
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs Evelyn Nand and Sukhandra Nand’s
(collectively "Plaintiffs") and Defendants Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (erroneously sued as
Specialized Portfolio Servicing, Inc.) (“SPS”) and National Default Servicing Corporation’s
stipulated request for a continuance of the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and Case
Management Conference. After considering the Parties’ stipulation and finding good cause, the
Court GRANTS the Parties’ stipulated request.
The February 3, 2017 hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and the Case
Management Conference are continued to February 16, 2017.
IT IS SO ORDERED
12
13
14
1/20/2017
DATED: ________________
HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARINGS
AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE
-4-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?