Nand et al v. Specialized Portfolio Servicing Inc., et al

Filing 53

SIPULATION AND ORDER as to 20 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint and 51 to Continue Motion to Dismiss Hearing and Case Management Conference: Initial Case Management Conference reset for 2/16/2017 at 01:30 PM in Court room 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Case Management Statement due by 2/9/2017. Motion Hearing re: 20 Motion to Dismiss reset for 2/16/2017 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Edward M. Chen. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/20/2017. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Matthew Mellen (SBN: 233350) Jessica Galletta (SBN: 281179) MELLEN LAW FIRM One Embarcadero Center, Fifth Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 315-1653 Facsimile: (415) 276-1902 Attorneys for Plaintiffs, EVELYN NAND SUKHANDRA NAND 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 EVELYN NAND, an individual; SUKHANDRA NAND, an individual Case No. 3:16-cv-04030-EMC STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING DATES ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER Plaintiffs, v. SPECIALIZED PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC., a business entity; NATIONAL DEFAULT SERVICING CORPORATION, a business entity; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive Complaint Filed: July 18, 2016 Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARINGS AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE -1- 1 TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 2 Plaintiffs Evelyn Nand and Sukhandra Nand (collectively "Plaintiffs") and Defendants 3 Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (erroneously sued as Specialized Portfolio Servicing, Inc.) 4 (“SPS”) and National Default Servicing Corporation (“NDSC,” collectively “Defendants”), by 5 and through their counsel of record, hereby respectfully submit this stipulated request for a short 6 continuance of the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and Case Management Conference, 7 both currently scheduled for February 3, 2017. 8 On July 18, 2016, Plaintiffs filed this action. ECF No. 1. 9 On August 9, 2016, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint, with a hearing 10 11 date of September 15, 2016. ECF No. 20. On August 19, 2016 the parties submitted a Stipulation and Proposed Order continuing the 12 haring on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and related filing deadlines. ECF No. 23. Pursuant to 13 the Stipulation, as amended by the Court, the hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary 14 injunction and Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss was continued to November 3, 2016. 15 On October 5, 2016 the parties submitted a Stipulation and Proposed Order continuing the 16 haring on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and related filing deadlines. ECF No. 29. Pursuant to 17 the Stipulation, as amended by the Court, the hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary 18 injunction and Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss was continued to December 15, 2016. ECF No. 30 19 On November 29, 2016, the parties submitted a Stipulation and Proposed Order 20 continuing the haring on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and related filing deadlines. ECF No. 34. 21 Pursuant to the Stipulation, as amended by the Court, the hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion for 22 preliminary injunction and Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss was continued to January 26, 2017. 23 ECF No. 35. 24 25 26 27 On January 10, 2017, the Court continued the hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and the Case Management Conference until January 27, 2017. ECF. No. 40. On January 17, 2017, the Court continued the hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and the Case Management Conference until February 3, 2017. ECF. No. 46. 28 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARINGS AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE -2- 1 2 3 4 5 On January 18, 2017, the Court issued an Order requiring personal appearance by the Parties at the hearings scheduled for February 3, 2017. ECF Nos. 48-49. On January 19, 2017, the Parties stipulated and agreed to withdrawal of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction, without prejudice. ECF. 50. Based on the foregoing and the Court’s requirement for personal appearance at the hearing 6 on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and the Case Management Conference, the Parties stipulate 7 and agree, at Plaintiffs’ request, to continue the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and 8 the Case Management Conference until February 16, 2017 in order to allow all counsel to 9 personally appear at the hearings. 10 11 Plaintiffs and Defendants so stipulate. DATED: January 19, 2017 STOEL RIVES LLP 12 By: /s/ Bryan L. Hawkins THOMAS A. WOODS BRYAN L. HAWKINS Attorneys for Defendants Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (erroneously sued as Specialized Portfolio Servicing, Inc.) and National Default Servicing Corporation 13 14 15 16 17 18 DATED: January 19, 2017 MELLEN LAW FIRM 19 By: /s/ Jessica Galletta JESSICA GALLETTA Attorneys for Plaintiffs 20 EVELYN NAND and SUKHANDRA NAND 21 22 23 ATTESTATION OF SIGNATURE: I attest under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that I have 24 received the concurrence in the filing of this document from the listed signatories as 25 required by Local Rule 5.1(i)(3). 26 Dated: August 19, 2016 /s/ Jessica Galletta JESSICA GALLETTA 27 28 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARINGS AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE -3- 1 ORDER 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs Evelyn Nand and Sukhandra Nand’s (collectively "Plaintiffs") and Defendants Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (erroneously sued as Specialized Portfolio Servicing, Inc.) (“SPS”) and National Default Servicing Corporation’s stipulated request for a continuance of the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and Case Management Conference. After considering the Parties’ stipulation and finding good cause, the Court GRANTS the Parties’ stipulated request. The February 3, 2017 hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and the Case Management Conference are continued to February 16, 2017. IT IS SO ORDERED 12 13 14 1/20/2017 DATED: ________________ HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARINGS AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE -4-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?