Huhn v. Facebook, Inc.
Filing
24
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 20 Stipulation Order re: Briefing on 7 Motion to Dismiss. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
KEKER & VAN NEST LLP
MICHAEL D. CELIO - # 197998
mcelio@kvn.com
BENEDICT Y. HUR - # 224018
bhur@kvn.com
JUSTINA SESSIONS - # 270914
jsessions@kvn.com
633 Battery Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-1809
Telephone:
415 391 5400
Facsimile:
415 397 7188
Attorneys for Defendant
FACEBOOK, INC.
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
JASON HUHN,
Case No. 3:16-cv-04035-HSG
12
Plaintiff,
13
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE:
BRIEFING ON MOTION TO DISMISS
v.
14
FACEBOOK, INC.,
15
Dept.:
Judge:
Courtroom 10, 19th Floor
Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
Defendant.
16
Trial Date: None Set
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: BRIEFING ON MOTION TO DISMISS
Case No. 3:16-cv-04035-HSG
1082125
1
2
Plaintiff Jason Huhn and Defendant Facebook, Inc. (“Facebook”), through their respective
counsel of record, stipulate as follows:
3
4
WHEREAS, Facebook removed this action to the United States District Court for the
District of New Jersey on June 22, 2016;
5
6
WHEREAS, Facebook filed a motion to transfer to this Court and a motion to dismiss the
complaint on July 13, 2016 and noticed both motions for hearing on August 15, 2016;
7
8
WHEREAS, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey granted
Facebook’s motion to transfer on July 15, 2016;
9
10
WHEREAS, this case was assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott
Corley on July 20, 2016;
11
WHEREAS, after Plaintiff declined magistrate jurisdiction, the Clerk of Court vacated all
12
pending hearing dates and ordered the parties to re-notice hearings upon reassignment on July 22,
13
2016;
WHEREAS, Facebook has re-noticed its motion to dismiss for hearing on September 22,
14
15
2016;
WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s time to oppose the motion to dismiss has passed and Plaintiff
16
17
seeks an extension of time to file its opposition; and
WHEREAS, Facebook has agreed to Plaintiff’s request for an extension of time and
18
19
Plaintiff has agreed to provide Facebook with additional time to file its reply; and
20
21
WHEREAS, the briefing schedule below provides for the motion to be fully briefed 28
days before the hearing;
22
THEREFORE, the parties stipulate and agree that, subject to the Court’s approval, further
23
briefing on Facebook’s motion to dismiss shall proceed as follows:
24
Plaintiff’s opposition shall be due August 11, 2016.
25
Facebook’s reply shall be due August 25, 2016.
26
27
28
Good cause supports this stipulated request, as set forth in the Declaration of Benedict Y.
Hur.
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer of this document attests that all signatories
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: BRIEFING ON MOTION TO DISMISS
Case No. 3:16-cv-04035-HSG
1082125
1
have concurred in its filing.
2
3
Dated: August 3, 2016
4
THE GLAPION LAW FIRM, LLC
By:
5
/s/ Jeremy M. Glapion
JEREMY M. GLAPION
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JASON HUHN
6
7
8
Dated: August 3, 2016
KEKER & VAN NEST LLP
9
By:
10
11
12
/s/ Benedict Y. Hur
MICHAEL D. CELIO
BENEDICT Y. HUR
JUSTINA SESSIONS
Attorneys for Defendant
FACEBOOK, INC.
13
14
ORDER
15
16
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
18
19
Dated: August 10, 2016
________________________________________
HON. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: BRIEFING ON MOTION TO DISMISS
Case No. 3:16-cv-04035-HSG
1082125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?