Chaiwong v. Hanlees Fremont, Inc. et al

Filing 34

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 31 Stipulation Continuing the Case Management Conference and Other Pending Deadlines. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2016)

1

6

Glassey | Smith
Sharon E. Glassey, SBN: 226481
Christopher T. Smith, SBN: 281599
Joshua C. Anaya, SBN: 265444
9685 Via Excelencia, Suite 108
San Diego, CA 92126
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

7

Attorneys for Plaintiff

2
3
4
5

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO COURTHOUSE

11
12

Weerachai Chaiwong, an individual;

13
14
15
16
17
18
19

Plaintiff,
v.
Hanlees Fremont, Inc., a California corporation,
dba Hanlees Fremont Hyundai;
Ally Financial, Inc., a Delaware corporation;
and
Does 1 through 75, inclusive,
Defendants.

Case No. 3:16-cv-04074-HSG
Stipulated Request for Order Continuing the
Case Management Conference and Other
Pending Deadlines (Civil L.R. 6-2);
[PROPOSED] Order
Judge:
Courtroom:

Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
10

Complaint Filed:
Removed:

May 25, 2016
July 20, 2016

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Stip. Request for Order Cont. CMC; [PROPOSED] Order - 3:16-cv-04074-HSG

1

Plaintiff Weerachai Chaiwong, Defendant Hanlees Fremont, Inc., dba Hanlees Fremont Hyundai,

2

and Defendant Ally Financial, Inc., hereinafter collectively referred to as the Parties, by and through their

3

respective attorneys of record, hereby enter into the following Stipulation.

4

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed the instant action in California state court on May 25, 2016.

5

WHEREAS, Defendant Ally removed the instant action on July 20, 2016. Defendant Ally moved

6

to dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint. Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint. Defendant Ally moved to

7

dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint, which is set for hearing on December 15, 2016.

8
9

WHEREAS, Defendant Hanlees appeared in the action on September 26, 2016, by answering and
filing a cross-complaint against Defendant Ally.

10

WHEREAS, the pleadings are not at issue to all parties.

11

WHEREAS, a case management statement is due by October 18, 2016.

12

WHEREAS, a case management conference (CMC) is currently set for October 25, 2016.

13

WHEREAS, the Parties agree that a continuance of the CMC to December 15, 2016, will permit

14

more efficient case management, will serve the interests of judicial economy, and will conserve the resources

15

of the Parties and the Court.

16

WHEREAS, the Parties have not previously requested any CMC continuances.

17
18
19

THEREFORE, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree, through
their respective counsel, as follows:

20
21
22

1.

The October 18, 2016, CMC shall be taken off calendar, and rescheduled for December 15,

2016, or another date that is convenient for the Court’s schedule.

23
24
25

2.

The deadline to file the case management statement shall be continued to seven days prior

to the new date for the CMC.

26
27
28
2
Stip. Request for Order Cont. CMC; [PROPOSED] Order - 3:16-cv-04074-HSG

1

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

2
3

October 13, 2016

4

Glassey | Smith
By:

5
6
7

October 13, 2016

8

Law Offices of Martin Putnam
By:

9
10
11
12
13
14

/s/ Joshua C. Anaya
_________________________
Joshua C. Anaya
Attorneys for Plaintiff

October 13, 2016

/s/ Maritn Putnam
_________________________
Martin Putnam
Attorneys for Defendant Hanlees
Fremont, Inc.
Severson & Werson

By:

/s/ Mary Kate Kamka
_________________________
Mary Kate Kamka
Attorneys for Defendant
Financial, Inc.

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Stip. Request for Order Cont. CMC; [PROPOSED] Order - 3:16-cv-04074-HSG

Ally

[PROPOSED] Order

1
2

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED

3
4
5
6

DATE:________13, 2016
October

By:

_________________________
Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
Stip. Request for Order Cont. CMC; [PROPOSED] Order - 3:16-cv-04074-HSG