Nankil et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al

Filing 4

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-50). CASE TRANSFERRED to the Northern District of California. MDL No. 2672. (Robles, S)

Download PDF
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1665 Filed 07/19/16 Page 13 3 Case MDL No. 2672 Document 1883 Filed 07/18/16 Page 1 of of UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: VOLKSWAGEN "CLEAN DIESEL" MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2672 (SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE) CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO −50) On December 8, 2015, the Panel transferred 56 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See __F.Supp.3d__ (J.P.M.L. 2015). Since that time, 831 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Northern District of California. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Charles R. Breyer. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of California and assigned to Judge Breyer. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Northern District of California for the reasons stated in the order of December 8, 2015, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Charles R. Breyer. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7−day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel. FOR THE PANEL: Jul 18, 2016 Jeffery N. Lüthi Clerk of the Panel I hereby certify that the annexed instrument is a true and correct copy of the original on file in my office. ATTEST: SUSAN Y. SOONG Clerk, U.S. District Court Northern District of California by: Date: Deputy Clerk 19 July 2016 Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1665 Filed 07/19/16 Page 23 3 Case MDL No. 2672 Document 1883 Filed 07/18/16 Page 2 of of IN RE: VOLKSWAGEN "CLEAN DIESEL" MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2672 SCHEDULE CTO−50 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION CALIFORNIA CENTRAL CAC 2 16−04405 CAC 2 16−04770 CAC 2 16−04774 CAC 5 16−01406 CAC 5 16−01451 CAC 5 16−01452 Michelle Wright v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al Jingjia Zhang v. Kathy Baran et al Vacated 7/12/16 Daniel Jensen et al v. Volkswagen Group of America Inc et al Michael H. Freeman, Jr. v. Volkswagen Group of America Inc. et al Rose Amador et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., et al David Dicenso v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., et al CALIFORNIA EASTERN CAE CAE 1 2 16−00959 16−01518 Nankil et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al Fernandez v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN CAS 3 16−01697 Nycum v. Volkswagen Group of America et al 16−01115 Flanagan v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al 4 16−00183 Berrigan v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. 2 16−03973 POTTER v. VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC. CONNECTICUT CT 3 GEORGIA SOUTHERN GAS NEW JERSEY NJ OKLAHOMA WESTERN Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1665 Filed 07/19/16 Page 33 3 Case MDL No. 2672 Document 1883 Filed 07/18/16 Page 3 of of OKW 5 16−00759 Pruitt v. Volkswagen AG et al 3 16−01349 Martin et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. 16−02426 Rickenmann v. Volkswagen Group of America Inc et al 7/15/16 Opposed 16−00623 16−00624 Adamson et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. Combs v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al Opposed 7/14/16 OREGON OR SOUTH CAROLINA SC 3 TEXAS WESTERN TXW TXW 1 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?