Campoy v. City and County of San Francisco, et al
Filing
60
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 59 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL; PROPOSED ORDER OF DISMISSAL filed by City and County of San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on October 17, 2018. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2018)
1
2
3
4
5
6
DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669
City Attorney
CHERYL ADAMS, State Bar #164194
Chief Trial Deputy
JAMES F. HANNAWALT, State Bar #139657
Deputy City Attorney
Fox Plaza
1390 Market Street, 6th Floor
San Francisco, California 94102-5408
Telephone:
(415) 554-3933
Facsimile:
(415) 554-3837
E-Mail:
james.hannawalt@sfcityatty.org
7
8
Attorneys for Defendant
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
FLORA CAMPOY, an individual,
13
Plaintiff,
14
Case No. 16-CV-04229-JST
vs.
15
17
CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO; SAN
FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT;
SFPD OFFICER CHRISTOPHER R.
HARDY, DOES 1 THROUGH 100,
INCLUSIVE,
18
REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL;
PROPOSED ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Defendants.
16
19
20
21
22
23
TO THE CLERK OF THE ABOVE-ENTITLED COURT:
A settlement agreeable to all parties has been reached in the above-mentioned matter. The
parties respectfully request that this case be dismissed with prejudice.
24
25
26
27
28
Request for Dismissal; Case No. 16-CV-04229-JST
1
n:\lit\li2018\161384\01269180.docx
1
Dated: October 16, 2018
ANDERSON & POOLE, P.C.
2
By: /s/ Deborah Goodman
DEBORAH GOODMAN
3
4
Attorneys for Plaintiff
FLORA CAMPOY
5
6
7
8
Dated: October 16, 2018
DENNIS J. HERRERA
City Attorney
CHERYL ADAMS
Chief Trial Deputy
JAMES F. HANNAWALT
Deputy City Attorney
9
10
11
12
13
By: /s/ James F. Hannawalt
JAMES F. HANNAWALT
14
Attorneys for Defendant
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
15
16
17
18
19
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
20
21
October 17, 2018
Dated: ______________________
22
23
24
HON. JON S. TIGAR
United States District Court Judge
25
26
27
28
Request for Dismissal; Case No. 16-CV-04229-JST
2
n:\lit\li2018\161384\01269180.docx
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?