Camarena, Jr. v. Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara

Filing 9

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 11/9/2016. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2016)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
JOSE LUIS CAMARENA, JR.,

7

Case No.16-cv-04289-JSC

Plaintiff,

8

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

v.

9

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA,

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

10

Defendant.

12
INTRODUCTION

13

Petitioner, a prisoner of the State of California proceeding pro se, filed a petition for a writ

14
15

of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging his state court judgment.1 He has paid the

16

filing fee. Because the petition indicates that the claims have not been exhausted, the petition is

17

DISMISSED without prejudice to refiling after the claims have been fairly presented to the

18

California Supreme Court.

19
BACKGROUND
20
In 2011, Petitioner was convicted of forcible rape in Santa Clara County Superior Court

21
22

based upon his guilty plea. The trial court sentenced him to a term of nine years and six months in

23

state prison. He did not file a direct appeal. He filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the

24

Santa Clara County Superior Court seeking to be resentenced to a misdemeanor under Proposition

25
26
27
1

28

Petitioner has consented to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 636(c). (ECF No. 8.)

1
2

47. The petition was denied. He filed no further post-conviction petitions in state or federal court
until he filed the instant petition.
DISCUSSION

3
4

I.

5
6
7

Standard of Review
This Court may entertain a petition for a writ of habeas corpus “in behalf of a person in

custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court only on the ground that he is in custody in
violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States.” 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a). It

8
9

shall “award the writ or issue an order directing the respondent to show cause why the writ should
not be granted, unless it appears from the application that the applicant or person detained is not

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

10

entitled thereto.” Id. § 2243.

12

II.

13
14

Legal Claims
Petitioner claims: (1) that his rights under Miranda v. Arizona were violated; (2) that he

received ineffective assistance of counsel; (3) that the sentence was longer than he anticipated; and

15
16
17

(4) that there was judicial misconduct.
An application for a federal writ of habeas corpus filed by a prisoner who is in state

18

custody pursuant to a judgment of a state court may not be granted unless the prisoner has first

19

exhausted state judicial remedies, either by way of a direct appeal or in collateral proceedings, by

20

presenting the highest state court available with a fair opportunity to rule on the merits of each and

21

every issue he or she seeks to raise in federal court. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b),(c); Granberry v.

22
Greer, 481 U.S. 129, 133-34 (1987).
23
24

Petitioner indicates in the petition that he has never filed an appeal or any post-conviction

25

petitions, motions or other applications in the California Supreme Court. Indeed, his only

26

challenge to his conviction or sentence was the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed in the

27

superior court, and that petition did not raise any of the four claims in the instant petition. Before

28

this Court can hear any of Petitioner’s claims for habeas relief, he must first present the California
2

1

Supreme Court --- either in a petition for a writ of habeas corpus or in an appeal from the denial of

2

such a petition from the California Court of Appeal --- with a fair opportunity to rule on such

3

claims. If the claims do not succeed in the California Supreme Court, then Petitioner may raise

4

them in a petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed in this Court. Because Petitioner has not fairly

5

presented his claims to the California Supreme Court, they have not been exhausted and must be

6

dismissed without prejudice.

7
CONCLUSION

8
9

For the foregoing reasons, the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED without
prejudice to refiling after Petitioner has exhausted his claims by fairly presenting them to the

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

10

California Supreme Court.

12
13
14

Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases requires a district court to rule on
whether a Petitioner is entitled to a certificate of appealability in the same order in which the
petition is decided. No reasonable jurist would find this Court's dismissal of his claims debatable

15
16
17
18
19
20

or wrong. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). Consequently, no certificate of
appealability is warranted in this case.
The clerk shall enter judgment and close the file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 9, 2016

21
22
23

JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
United States Magistrate Judge

24
25
26
27
28
3

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

JOSE LUIS CAMARENA, JR.,

Case No. 16-cv-04289-JSC

Plaintiff,
8
v.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

9
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA,

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

10

Defendant.

12
13
14
15
16
17

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S.
District Court, Northern District of California.
That on November 9, 2016, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by
placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by
depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery
receptacle located in the Clerk's office.

18
19
20

Jose Luis Camarena, Jr. ID: AK-6637
1308 Wabash Street
P.O. Box 357
Alviso, CA 95002

21
22
23

Dated: November 9, 2016

24
25

Susan Y. Soong
Clerk, United States District Court

26
27
28

By:________________________
Ada Means, Deputy Clerk to the
Honorable JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
4