Hines III v. Colvin
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why default should not be entered. Response due by April 18, 2017. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero on April 11, 2017. (jcslc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/11/2017)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JAMES HINES III,
Case No. 16-cv-04306-JCS
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
DEFAULT SHOULD NOT BE
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Plaintiff James Hines III filed his motion for summary judgment on January 31, 2017 in
this action for review of an adverse administrative decision by Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”). Pursuant to Local Rule 16-5, the
Commissioner’s response was due February 28, 2017. On that date, the parties filed a stipulation
extending the deadline for the Commissioner’s response to March 30, 2017, and the Court issued
an order to that effect on March 3, 2017. The extended deadline has since passed, and the
Commissioner has not filed her response to Hines’s motion. The Commissioner is therefore
ORDERED to file a response no later than April 18, 2017 showing cause why default should not
be entered. The Court finds this matter suitable for resolution without oral argument.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 11, 2017.
JOSEPH C. SPERO
Chief Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?