Hines III v. Colvin

Filing 21

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why default should not be entered. Response due by April 18, 2017. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero on April 11, 2017. (jcslc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/11/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JAMES HINES III, Case No. 16-cv-04306-JCS Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 10 NANCY A. BERRYHILL, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFAULT SHOULD NOT BE ENTERED Defendant. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 Plaintiff James Hines III filed his motion for summary judgment on January 31, 2017 in 13 this action for review of an adverse administrative decision by Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill, 14 Acting Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”). Pursuant to Local Rule 16-5, the 15 Commissioner’s response was due February 28, 2017. On that date, the parties filed a stipulation 16 extending the deadline for the Commissioner’s response to March 30, 2017, and the Court issued 17 an order to that effect on March 3, 2017. The extended deadline has since passed, and the 18 Commissioner has not filed her response to Hines’s motion. The Commissioner is therefore 19 ORDERED to file a response no later than April 18, 2017 showing cause why default should not 20 be entered. The Court finds this matter suitable for resolution without oral argument. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 11, 2017. ______________________________________ JOSEPH C. SPERO Chief Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?