Hines III v. Colvin

Filing 21

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why default should not be entered. Response due by April 18, 2017. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero on April 11, 2017. (jcslc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/11/2017)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

JAMES HINES III,

Case No. 16-cv-04306-JCS

Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10

NANCY A. BERRYHILL,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
DEFAULT SHOULD NOT BE
ENTERED

Defendant.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

Plaintiff James Hines III filed his motion for summary judgment on January 31, 2017 in

13

this action for review of an adverse administrative decision by Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill,

14

Acting Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”). Pursuant to Local Rule 16-5, the

15

Commissioner’s response was due February 28, 2017. On that date, the parties filed a stipulation

16

extending the deadline for the Commissioner’s response to March 30, 2017, and the Court issued

17

an order to that effect on March 3, 2017. The extended deadline has since passed, and the

18

Commissioner has not filed her response to Hines’s motion. The Commissioner is therefore

19

ORDERED to file a response no later than April 18, 2017 showing cause why default should not

20

be entered. The Court finds this matter suitable for resolution without oral argument.

21

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 11, 2017.
______________________________________
JOSEPH C. SPERO
Chief Magistrate Judge