ICE Consulting, Inc. et al v. Jensen

Filing 105

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 103 to Vacate Without Prejudice the Hearing on ICE's Motion to Dismiss and Case Management Conference. Motions terminated: 78 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant and Counter-Claimant Gavin Jensen's Second, Third, Fourth, and Fifth Counterclaims. Case Management Statement due by 2/23/2017. Further Case Management Conference set for 3/2/2017 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/30/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/30/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NOSSAMAN LLP VERONICA M. GRAY (SBN 72572) vgray@nossaman.com ANDREW C. CRANE (SBN 285211) acrane@nossaman.com 18101 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 1800 Irvine, CA 92612 Telephone: 949.833.7800 Facsimile: 949.833.7878 S. ASHAR AHMED (SBN 256711) aahmed@nossaman.com 50 California Street, 34th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415.398.3600 Facsimile: 415.398.2438 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants ICE Consulting, Inc.; Uzair Sattar; and Derick Needham [Additional Counsel on Signature Page] 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 18 19 ICE CONSULTING, INC., UZAIR SATTAR, and DERICK NEEDHAM Plaintiffs and CounterDefendants, 20 21 22 vs. GAVIN JENSEN, 23 Defendant and CounterClaimant. 24 25 Case No: 3:16-cv-04349-EMC STIPULATION TO VACATE WITHOUT PREJUDICE THE HEARING ON ICE CONSULTING, INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER Current Date of CMC and Hearing: Feb. 2, 2017 Trial: Not Set 26 27 28 Case No. 3:16-cv-04349-EMC STIPULATION TO VACATE WITHOUT PREJUDICE THE HEARING ON ICE CONSULTING, INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 44844401.v1 1 Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants ICE 2 Consulting, Inc. (“ICE”), Uzair Sattar, and Derick Needham (collectively, 3 “Plaintiffs”), and Defendant and Counter-Claimant Gavin Jensen (“Defendant”) 4 (Plaintiffs and Defendant are herein referred to collectively as the “Parties”), by 5 and through their respective counsel, hereby enter into this Stipulation to Vacate 6 Without Prejudice the Hearing on ICE’s Motion to Dismiss and the Case 7 Management Conference set for February 2, 2017. 8 9 WHEREAS, on December 9, 2016, the Parties reached a settlement in principle. Crane Dec., ¶ 2. 10 WHEREAS, on January 25, 2017, after continued negotiation and 11 discussions, the Parties reached agreement on all the terms of a formal, written 12 settlement agreement. Crane Dec., ¶ 3. 13 WHEREAS, on January 25, 2017, counsel for the Parties received a request 14 from the clerk of this Court regarding the status of the Parties’ settlement in light 15 of the upcoming hearing on ICE’s Motion to Dismiss on February 2, 2017. Crane 16 Dec., ¶ 4. 17 WHEREAS, on January 25, 2017, counsel for Plaintiffs responded to the 18 clerk of this Court that (1) the Parties had just finally come to terms on the 19 language of their written settlement agreement and were in the process of 20 exchanging signatures; and (2) the Parties intend to file a Joint Motion requesting 21 the Court to retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement once signatures 22 had been exchanged, followed by a Joint Request for Dismissal. Crane Dec., ¶ 4. 23 WHEREAS, in response, on January 27, 2017, the clerk of this Court 24 requested that the Parties submit a stipulation vacating the hearing date on ICE’s 25 Motion to Dismiss without prejudice to being re-noticed if necessary, in order to 26 avoid the Court spending unnecessary time preparing for the Motion. Crane Dec., 27 ¶ 5. 28 -1- Case No. 3:16-cv-04349-EMC STIPULATION TO VACATE WITHOUT PREJUDICE THE HEARING ON ICE CONSULTING, INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 44844401.v1 1 THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE: 2 That the hearing on ICE’s Motion to Dismiss and the Case Management 3 Conference set for February 2, 2017, at 1:30 p.m. be vacated without prejudice to 4 be re-noticed at a later date if necessary. 5 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 6 7 Date: January 27, 2017 8 9 By: /s/ Andrew C. Crane Andrew C. Crane 10 11 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and CounterDefendants ICE Consulting, Inc.; Uzair Sattar; and Derick Needham 12 13 14 Date: January 27, 2017 15 17 Attorneys for Defendant and CounterClaimant Gavin Jensen 18 19 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 DHILLON LAW GROUP INC By: /s/ Nitoj P. Singh Nitoj P. Singh 16 20 NOSSAMAN LLP VERONICA M. GRAY ANDREW C. CRANE Additional Counsel: HARMEET K. DHILLON (SBN: 207873) harmeet@dhillonlaw.com NITOJ P. SINGH (SBN: 265005) nsingh@dhillonlaw.com DHILLON LAW GROUP INC. 177 Post Street, Suite 700 San Francisco, California 94108 Telephone: (415) 433-1700 Facsimile: (415) 520-6593 Attorneys for Defendant Gavin Jensen 28 -2- Case No. 3:16-cv-04349-EMC STIPULATION TO VACATE WITHOUT PREJUDICE THE HEARING ON ICE CONSULTING, INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 44844401.v1 1 ORDER 2 PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, 3 IT IS SO ORDERED that the hearing on Plaintiff ICE Consulting, Inc.’s 4 Motion to Dismiss, and the Case Management Conference, set February 2, 5 2017 at 1:30 P.M. is VACATED without prejudice to being re-noticed at a 6 later date if it becomes necessary. A Further CMC is set for 3/2/2017 at 10:30 a.m. An updated joint CMC statement shall be filed by 7 2/23/17. 8 RT U O 9 S DISTRICT TE C TA UNIT ED S _________________________________ Hon. Edward M. ChenD ERE United S SO ORD ED Judge States District IT I RT 13 dward Judge E ER 15 n M. Che A H 14 R NIA NO 12 DIFI AS MO FO 11 LI 10 N F D IS T IC T O R C 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3- Case No. 3:16-cv-04349-EMC STIPULATION TO VACATE WITHOUT PREJUDICE THE HEARING ON ICE CONSULTING, INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 44844401.v1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?