ICE Consulting, Inc. et al v. Jensen

Filing 109

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 108 OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AND COURT TO RETAIN JURISDICTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT filed by ICE Consulting, Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/9/19. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

NOSSAMAN LLP
VERONICA M. GRAY (SBN 72572)
[e-mail]
ANDREW C. CRANE (SBN 285211)
[e-mail]
18101 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 1800
Irvine, CA 92612
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 949.833.7878
S. ASHAR AHMED (SBN 256711)
[e-mail]
50 California Street, 34th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.398.2438

12

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants
ICE Consulting, Inc.; Uzair Sattar;
and Derick Needham

13

[Additional Counsel listed on Signature Page]

11

14
15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

18
19

ICE CONSULTING, INC., UZAIR
SATTAR, and DERICK NEEDHAM

20

Plaintiffs and CounterDefendants,

21
22
23

vs.
GAVIN JENSEN,
Defendant and CounterClaimant.

24

Case No: 3:16-cv-04349-EMC
JOINT STIPULATION OF
DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH
PREJUDICE AND COURT TO
RETAIN JURISDICTION TO
ENFORCE SETTLEMENT;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Trial: Not Set

25
26
27
28
Case No. 3:16-cv-04349-EMC

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ALL CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED]
ORDER
46923436.v1

1

Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants ICE Consulting, Inc. (“ICE” ); Uzair

2

Sattar (“Sattar” ); and Derick Needham (collectively, “Plaintiffs” ); and Defendant

3

and Counter-Claimant Gavin Jensen (“Defendant” ) (Plaintiffs and Defendant shall

4

be referred to individually as “Party” and collectively as “Parties” ), by and

5

through their respective attorneys, file this stipulation pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2)

6

and (c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and agree that: (a) all claims or

7

causes of action that were asserted by Plaintiffs against Defendant in the First

8

Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 33) in the above-entitled action (“Action” ) are to

9

be dismissed with prejudice; (b) all claims or causes of action which were asserted

10

by Defendant against Plaintiffs in the Counterclaim(s) (Dkt. No. 62) in the Action

11

are to be dismissed with prejudice; (c) each Party is to bear its own attorneys’fees

12

and costs (except to the extent agreed to in writing otherwise); (d) each Party

13

waives its right to appeal from the Court’ Order entered pursuant to this
s

14

Stipulation; and (e) this Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the

15

Confidential Settlement Agreement as set forth in its February 6, 2017 Order (Dkt.

16

No. 107) retaining jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Confidential Settlement

17

Agreement entered into by the Parties.

18
19
20

Date:

February 7, 2017

21
22

NOSSAMAN LLP
VERONICA M. GRAY
ANDREW C. CRANE
By: /s/ Andrew C. Crane
Andrew C. Crane

23
24

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and CounterDefendants
ICE Consulting, Inc.; Uzair Sattar;
and Derick Needham

25
26
27
28

-1-

Case No. 3:16-cv-04349-EMC

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ALL CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
46923436.v1

1

Date:

February 7, 2017

DHILLON LAW GROUP INC

2
By: /s/ Nitoj P. Singh
Nitoj P. Singh

3
4

Attorneys for Defendant and CounterClaimant
Gavin Jensen

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

Additional Counsel:
HARMEET K. DHILLON (SBN: 207873)
[e-mail]
NITOJ P. SINGH (SBN: 265005)
[e-mail]
DHILLON LAW GROUP INC.
177 Post Street, Suite 700
San Francisco, California 94108
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant Gavin Jensen

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-

Case No. 3:16-cv-04349-EMC

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ALL CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
46923436.v1

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

2

Pursuant to the Parties Joint Stipulation of Dismissal of All Claims with Prejudice,

3

and Good Cause Appearing,

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

IT IS SO ORDERED that:
1.

All claims or causes of action that were asserted by Plaintiffs against

Defendant in the First Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 33) in the above-entitled
action (“Action” ) are hereby dismissed with prejudice;
2.

All claims or causes of action which were asserted by Defendant

against Plaintiffs in the Counterclaim(s) (Dkt. No. 62) in the Action are hereby
dismissed with prejudice;
3.

Each Party shall bear its own attorneys’fees and costs (except to the

extent agreed to in writing otherwise);
4.

Each Party waives its right to appeal from this Order;

5.

This Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the

15

Confidential Settlement Agreement as set forth in its February 6, 2017 Order (Dkt.

16

No. 107) retaining jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Confidential Settlement

17

Agreement entered into by the Parties. The Clerk of the Court is directed
to close this case.

18
Dated:

2/9/2017

UNIT
ED

20

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

S

HON. EDWARD M. CHEN

dwar
Judge E

ER

H

25
26

FO

RT

24

en

d M. Ch

NO

23

LI

22

O
IT IS S
IFIED
S MOD
A

R NIA

ED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
ORDER

21

A

19

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C

27
28
-146923436.v1

Case No. 3:16-cv-04349-EMC