ICE Consulting, Inc. et al v. Jensen

Filing 58

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Why Sanctions Should Not Be Imposed. Show Cause Response due by 9/23/2016. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/16/2016. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2016)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

ICE CONSULTING, INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,

8

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE
IMPOSED

9

v.

10

GAVIN JENSEN,

11

Defendant.

12
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

Case No. 16-cv-04349-EMC

13

Plaintiff Uzair Sattar (“Sattar”) filed a complaint and declarations in support of Plaintiffs’

14

Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Plaintiffs’ Ex Parte Application for a Civil Seizure

15

Order. See Docket Nos. 7, 11. These pleadings contain material misstatements.

16

Within one week of the date of this order, Plaintiff Sattar is hereby ordered to show cause

17

why sanctions should not be imposed against Mr. Sattar under Rule 11. Plaintiff Sattar shall file a

18

brief not exceeding seven (7) pages together with any evidence in support thereof.

19
20

IT IS SO ORDERED.

21

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: September 16, 2016
______________________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge