ICE Consulting, Inc. et al v. Jensen

Filing 58

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Why Sanctions Should Not Be Imposed. Show Cause Response due by 9/23/2016. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/16/2016. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ICE CONSULTING, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, 8 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED 9 v. 10 GAVIN JENSEN, 11 Defendant. 12 For the Northern District of California United States District Court Case No. 16-cv-04349-EMC 13 Plaintiff Uzair Sattar (“Sattar”) filed a complaint and declarations in support of Plaintiffs’ 14 Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Plaintiffs’ Ex Parte Application for a Civil Seizure 15 Order. See Docket Nos. 7, 11. These pleadings contain material misstatements. 16 Within one week of the date of this order, Plaintiff Sattar is hereby ordered to show cause 17 why sanctions should not be imposed against Mr. Sattar under Rule 11. Plaintiff Sattar shall file a 18 brief not exceeding seven (7) pages together with any evidence in support thereof. 19 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: September 16, 2016 ______________________________________ EDWARD M. CHEN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?