Ron Alul et al v. American Honda Motor Company, Inc.

Filing 111

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 110 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Joint Stipulation Regarding Scheduling Submitted Pursuant to August 24, 2017, Order (D.E. 107) filed by Ron Alul, Melissa Yeung, Donald Tran, Yun-Fei Lou, Mark Gerstle , Charles Burgess, Don Awtrey, John Kelly, Lindsey Aberin, Daniel Criner, Jared Crooks, Joy Matza, Jordan Moss, Jeff Aberin Case Management Statement due by 12/4/2017. Further Case Management Conference set for 12/13/2017 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 5, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/5/2017)

1
2
3
4

Christopher A. Seeger (pro hac vice)
SEEGER WEISS LLP
77 Water Street, 26th Floor
New York, NY 10005
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

James E. Cecchi (pro hac vice)
CARELLA, BYRNE, CECCHI, OLSTEIN,
BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C.
5 Becker Farm Road
Roseland, NJ 07068
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Counsel for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Classes
[Additional Counsel Listed on Signature Page]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

15
16

Aberin et al. v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.

No. 3:16-cv-04384-JST
JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING
SCHEDULING SUBMITTED
PURSUANT TO AUGUST 24, 2017,
ORDER (D.E. 107)

17
18
19

Second Amended Complaint filed:
July 7, 2017

20

Judge: Hon. Jon S. Tigar

21
22
23
24

Pursuant to this Court’s August 24, 2017, Order (D.E. 107), Plaintiffs Lindsey and Jeff
Aberin, Don Awtry, Charles Burgess, Daniel Criner, Jared Croooks, Ron Alul, Mark Gerstle, John

25
Kelly, Yun-Fei Lou, Joy Matza, Jordan Moss, Donald Tran, and Melissa Yeung (collectively,
26
27
28

1
JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING SCHEDULING FILED PURSUANT TO AUGUST 24, 2017 ORDER (D.E.
107)
3:16-cv-05384-JST

1

“Plaintiffs”), and Defendant American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (“AHM” and collectively with

2

Plaintiffs, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby submit this Joint Stipulation

3
4

Regarding Scheduling of (1) Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Certain Counts in Plaintiffs’ Second
Amended Complaint, to Strike Certain Restitution Claims, and for Sanctions for Spoliation of

5
6
7

Evidence (“Motion to Dismiss”) (D.E. 105); and (2) a Case Management Conference.
1.

(“SACC”).

8
9

2.

10
11

On July 7, 2017, Plaintiffs filed their Second Amended Class Action Complaint

On July 12, 2017, the Parties stipulated to an extension of time allowing Defendant
until August 21, 2017 to respond to the SACC.

3.

On August 21, 2017, Defendant filed its Motion to Dismiss Certain Counts in

12
Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint, to Strike Certain Restitution Claims, and for
13
Sanctions for Spoliation of Evidence (“Motion to Dismiss”) (D.E. 105).

14
15

4.

Plaintiff’s response to the Motion to Dismiss is currently due on September 5, 2017.

16

5.

The Parties agree that Plaintiff shall have up until and including October 6, 2017 to

17
18

respond to the Motion to Dismiss.
6.

19

The Parties agree that AHM shall have up until and including October 31, 2017 to
submit a reply in support of its Motion to Dismiss.

20
7.

The Parties propose that the hearing on the Motion to Dismiss be rescheduled from

21
September 28, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. to November 16, 2017 at 2:00 p.m., or to another

22

date convenient to the Court.

23
24
25

8.

The Parties proposed that a Case Management Conference be scheduled for
December 13, 2017 at 2:00 p.m., or to another date convenient to the Court.

26
27
28

2
JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING SCHEDULING FILED PURSUANT TO AUGUST 24, 2017 ORDER (D.E.
107)
3:16-cv-05384-JST

1

9.

2
3
4

The Parties shall file a Joint Case Management Conference Statement seven (7) Court
days prior to the Conference.

10.

This stipulation and request is made in the interest of justice, not to delay the
proceedings, and will not prejudice any party. The requested extension will have no

5
6
7

impact on the schedule for the litigation.
DATED: September 5, 2017

Respectfully submitted,

8
9

Attorneys for Defendant American Honda
Motor Company, Inc.

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Classes

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

SEEGER WEISS LLP

By /s/ Livia M. Kiser
Livia M. Kiser (SBN 285411)
[e-mail]
Michael C. Andolina (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Andrew J. Chinsky (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
One South Dearborn
Chicago, IL 60603
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

By /s/ Christopher A. Seeger
Christopher A. Seeger (pro hac vice)
Stephen A. Weiss (pro hac vice)
Scott Alan George (pro hac vice)
SEEGER WEISS LLP
77 Water Street, New York,
New York, NY 10005
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]

Eric B. Schwartz (SBN 266554)
[e-mail]
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
555 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000
Los Angeles, California 90013
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

Steve W. Berman (pro hac vice)
Catherine Y.N. Gannon (pro hac vice)
HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
1918 Eighth Avenue, Suite 3300
Seattle, WA 98101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Shana E. Scarlett (SBN 217895)
715 Hearst Avenue, Suite 202
Berkeley, CA 94710
Telephone: [phone]

25
26
27
28

3
JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING SCHEDULING FILED PURSUANT TO AUGUST 24, 2017 ORDER (D.E.
107)
3:16-cv-05384-JST

1

Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

2
Roland K. Tellis (SBN 186269)
Mark P. Pifko (SBN 228412)
BARON & BUDD, P.C.
15910 Ventura Blvd, Suite 1600
Encino, CA 91436
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]

3
4
5
6
7
8

James E. Cecchi (pro hac vice)
CARELLA, BYRNE, CECCHI, OLSTEIN,
BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C.
5 Becker Farm Road
Roseland, NJ 07068
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

9
10
11
12

James C. Shah
SHEPHERD, FINKELMAN, MILLER
& SHAH, LLP
44 Montgomery Street, Suite 650
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

4
JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING SCHEDULING FILED PURSUANT TO AUGUST 24, 2017 ORDER (D.E.
107)
3:16-cv-05384-JST

1
2

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
I am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file the foregoing

3

Stipulation. In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5.1, I hereby attest that the signatory has concurred

4

in this filing.

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: September 5, 2017

By: /s/ Christopher A. Seeger

PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Pursuant to the above Stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED:

September 5, 2017
______________________
Hon. Jon S. Tigar