Ron Alul et al v. American Honda Motor Company, Inc.

Filing 114

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 113 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Increasing The Page Limit Of America Honda Motor Co., Inc.'s Reply In Support Of Motion To Dismiss By Two Pages filed by American Honda Motor Company, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on October 26, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

Livia M. Kiser (SBN 285411)
[e-mail]
Michael C. Andolina (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Andrew J. Chinsky (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
One South Dearborn
Chicago, IL 60603
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Eric B. Schwartz (SBN 266554)
[e-mail]
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
555 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000
Los Angeles, California 90013
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant American
Honda Motor Co. Inc.

12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

15
16
17
18
19

LINDSEY and JEFF ABERIN, DON AWTREY,
CHARLES BURGESS, DANIEL CRINER,
JARED CROOKS, MARK GERSTLE, JOHN
KELLY, YUN-FEI LOU, JOY MATZA,
JORDAN MOSS, DONALD TRAN, and
MELISSA YEUNG, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated.

20

Plaintiff,

21
vs.
22
23
24
25
26

AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC.,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 3:16-cv-04384-JST
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER INCREASING THE PAGE
LIMIT OF AMERICAN HONDA
MOTOR CO., INC’S REPLY IN
SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS
BY TWO PAGES
Date: November 16, 2017
Time: 2:00 p.m.
Place: Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, Phillip
Burton Federal Building
The Hon. Jon S. Tigar

27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO INCREASE THE PAGE LIMIT OF AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC.’S REPLY
IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS BY TWO PAGES

1

Plaintiffs Lindsey and Jeff Aberin, Don Awtrey, Charles Burgess, Daniel Criner, Jared

2

Crooks, Mark Gerstle, John Kelly, Yun-Fei Lou, Joy Matza, Jordan Moss, Donald Tran, and Melissa

3

Yeung (“Plaintiffs”), and Defendant American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (“AHM”), pursuant to

4

Northern District of California Civil Local Rule 7-12 and subject to approval by the Court, hereby

5

stipulate to increase the page limit of AHM’s Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss by two pages

6

(from 15 pages to 17 pages), and in support state as follows:

7

1.

8

(“SAC”).

9

2.

On July 7, 2017, Plaintiffs filed their Second Amended Class Action Complaint

The SAC includes 12 named Plaintiffs who seek to bring a putative nationwide class

10

action or, alternatively, putative statewide subclasses for 8 different states. The SAC includes causes

11

of action set out in 40 separate counts.

12

3.

On August 21, 2017, AHM filed a Motion to Dismiss (“Motion”) certain counts of

13

the SAC.

14

4.

On October 6, 2017, Plaintiffs filed an Opposition to the Motion (“Opposition”).

15

5.

AHM’s Reply in Support of its Motion (“Reply”) is due October 31, 2017. AHM has

16

endeavored to keep its Reply as succinct as possible, but given the number of Plaintiffs, the

17

complexity of the issues—including legal arguments raised by Plaintiffs for the first time in their

18

Opposition which, while proper, AHM has not had a chance to previously address—and desire to

19

avoid the need for future motions to dismiss, AHM respectfully submits that two extra pages are

20

appropriate to allow AHM to fully respond to Plaintiff’s Opposition.

21
22
23
24

6.

AHM does not intend to raise any new arguments in its Reply that it has not raised in

its Motion or that Plaintiffs did not raise in their Opposition.
WHEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND REQUEST that the Court
enter an Order increasing the page limit of AHM’s Reply by two pages (from 15 to 17 pages).

25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO INCREASE THE PAGE LIMIT OF AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC.’S REPLY
IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS BY TWO PAGES
1

1

DATED: October 26, 2017

Respectfully submitted,

2
Attorneys for Defendant American Honda
Motor Company, Inc.

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Classes

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

3

SEEGER WEISS LLP

By /s/ Livia M. Kiser
Livia M. Kiser (SBN 285411)
[e-mail]
Michael C. Andolina (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Andrew J. Chinsky (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
One South Dearborn
Chicago, IL 60603
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

By /s/ Christopher A. Seeger
Christopher A. Seeger (pro hac vice)
Stephen A. Weiss (pro hac vice)
Scott Alan George (pro hac vice)
Daniel R. Leathers (pro hac vice)
SEEGER WEISS LLP
77 Water Street, New York,
New York, NY 10005
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

Eric B. Schwartz (SBN 266554)
[e-mail]
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
555 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000
Los Angeles, California 90013
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

Steve W. Berman (pro hac vice)
Catherine Y.N. Gannon (pro hac vice)
HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
1918 Eighth Avenue, Suite 3300
Seattle, WA 98101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Shana E. Scarlett (SBN 217895)
715 Hearst Avenue, Suite 202
Berkeley, CA 94710
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Roland K. Tellis (SBN 186269)
Mark P. Pifko (SBN 228412)
BARON & BUDD, P.C.
15910 Ventura Blvd, Suite 1600
Encino, CA 91436
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]

28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO INCREASE THE PAGE LIMIT OF AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC.’S REPLY
IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS BY TWO PAGES
2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

James E. Cecchi (pro hac vice)
CARELLA, BYRNE, CECCHI, OLSTEIN,
BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C.
5 Becker Farm Road
Roseland, NJ 07068
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
James C. Shah
Shepherd Finkelman Miller & Shah, LLP
44 Montgomery Street, Suite 650
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Toby James Marshall (pro hac vice)
Amanda M Steiner (pro hac vice)
Brittany A. Madderra (pro hac vice)
Terrell Marshall Law Group PLLC
936 North 34th Street, Suite 300
Seattle, WA 98103-8869
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO INCREASE THE PAGE LIMIT OF AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC.’S REPLY
IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS BY TWO PAGES
3

1
2

[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURUSANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

3
4
5

October 26, 2017
DATED: _____________

____________________________________________
HON JON. S. TIGAR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO INCREASE THE PAGE LIMIT OF AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC.’S REPLY
IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS BY TWO PAGES
5