Ron Alul et al v. American Honda Motor Company, Inc.
Filing
95
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 93 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR filed by Melissa Yeung, Donald Tran, Arpan Srivastava, Yun-Fei Lou, Mark Gerstle, Don Awtrey, John Kelly, Lindsey Aberin, Daniel Criner, Jordan Moss. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 5, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/5/2017)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Lindsay Aberin, et al..
Plaintiff(s)
CASE No C 3:16-cv-04384-JST
AMENDED
v.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
American Honda Motor Company Inc.
(Supersedes D.E.40)
Defendant(s)
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following
stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the
following ADR process:
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
s
Private ADR (specify process and provider)
Mediation by JAMS Mediator to be agreed
upon by the parties
Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct
mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an
early settlement conference with a Magistrate
Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this
form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR
L.R. 3-5.
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR,
unless otherwise ordered. )
other requested deadline: 2/26/2018
s
Date: 6/30/2017
Date: 6/30/2017
/s/ Christopher A. Seeger
Attorney for Plaintiff
/s/ Livia M. Kiser
Attorney for Defendant
x IT IS SO ORDERED
IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS:
Date: July 5, 2017
U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed
Order Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulation & Proposed
Order Selecting Private ADR.”
Form ADR-Stip rev. 1-2017
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?