Schmitz v. Sanofi S.A. et al
Filing
13
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST FOR STAY PENDING MDL TRANSFER DECISION; DIRECTING PARTIES TO SUBMIT JOINT STATUS REPORT. The parties are ordered to file, no later than October 28, 2016, a joint status report if the action has not been transferred by said date. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 09/09/16. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2016)
1
2
3
4
Karen Barth Menzies (SBN: 180234)
kbm@classlawgroup.com
GIBBS LAW GROUP LLP
400 Continental Blvd, 6th Floor
El Segundo, California 90245
Telephone: 510-350-9240
Facsimile: 510-350-9701
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Eric H. Gibbs (SBN: 178658)
Amy M. Zeman (SBN: 273100)
ehg@classlawgroup.com
amz@classlawgroup.com
GIBBS LA GROUP LLP
505 14th Street, Suite 1110
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: 510-350-9700
Facsimile: 510-350-9701
Attorneys for PLAINTIFF
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
G. Gregg Webb (SBN: 298787)
gwebb@shb.com
SHOOK, HARDY & BACON L.L.P.
One Montgomery, Suite 2700
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: 415-544-1900
Facsimile: 415-391-0281
Attorneys for Defendant
SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC
19
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
20
21
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
BERTHA RENEE SCHMITZ,
22
23
24
25
26
Plaintiff,
vs.
SANOFI S.A.,
AVENTIS PHARMA S.A., and
SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC,
Defendants.
27
Case No. 3:16-cv-04619-MMC
ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR STAY
PENDING MDL TRANSFER DECISION;
DECLARATION OF G. GREGG WEBB;
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
DIRECTING PARTIES TO SUBMIT JOINT
STATUS REPORT
28
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR STAY PENDING MDL TRANSFER DECISION
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-04619-MMC
344546 v1
1
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, Plaintiff Bertha Renee Schmitz and Defendant Sanofi-Aventis
2
U.S. LLC 1 (collectively, “the Parties”) hereby stipulate and request that the Court enter the
3
accompanying Proposed Order staying this action for all purposes pending a decision by the Judicial
4
Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (“JPML”) on the previously filed Motion for Transfer seeking to
5
centralize this case and all other docetaxel cases filed nationally into a Multidistrict Litigation
6
(“MDL”) proceeding (the “MDL Motion”). As described below, Defendant Sanofi-Aventis U.S.
7
LLC did not oppose creation of an MDL. The JPML has set the MDL Motion for hearing on
8
September 29, 2016, and the Parties anticipate that the JPML will issue its ruling shortly thereafter.
9
Granting a brief stay of this action will ensure that the JPML has an opportunity to hear and rule
10
upon the pending Motion for Transfer and will prevent potentially unnecessary and duplicative
11
proceedings before this Court, thereby conserving both this Court and the Parties’ time and
12
resources.
13
In support of this Stipulation, the Parties state further as follows:
14
The Pending MDL Motion for Transfer
15
1.
On July 22, 2016, plaintiffs filed a Motion for Transfer before the Judicial Panel on
16
Multidistrict Litigation, requesting creation of an MDL proceeding to centralize all docetaxel cases
17
filed in federal court, including this case. (See In re Taxotere (Docetaxel) Prod. Liab. Litig., MDL
18
No. 2740 (MDL Dkt. # 1).) Plaintiffs’ initial motion sought to transfer thirty-three actions (id.), and
19
since then, notices of related actions have been filed identifying twenty-six additional actions (see
20
MDL Dkt.). In responding to the MDL Motion, Defendant Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC did not oppose
21
the creation of a multidistrict litigation proceeding for this action and other included actions pending
22
nationwide. (See MDL Dkt. # 42.)
23
Hearing Session on September 29, 2016, in Washington, D.C., and a ruling on whether this case and
24
others will be centralized is anticipated shortly thereafter. (See MDL Dkt. # 27.)
The JPML set the hearing on the MDL Motion for its next
25
26
27
28
1
Named Defendants Sanofi S.A. and Aventis Pharma S.A. have not been served in this case. By
filing this Stipulation, Defendants expressly do not waive any claims or defenses, including without
limitation defenses based on this Court’s lack of personal jurisdiction.
2
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR STAY PENDING MDL TRANSFER DECISION
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-04619-MMC
1
2.
The Parties agree that good cause exists to stay this action to permit the JPML to
2
decide the pending Motion for Transfer. A stay will ensure that the JPML has an opportunity to hear
3
and rule upon the Motion and will prevent potentially unnecessary and duplicative proceedings
4
before this Court. Should the JPML grant the Motion for Transfer this case likely will be transferred
5
away from this Court and into an MDL proceeding established elsewhere. Therefore, a stay will
6
conserve both judicial resources and those of the Parties as well as facilitate the efficient conduct of
7
this action before this Court and as part of any future MDL proceeding. The Parties further agree
8
that a brief stay to permit the JPML to decide the Motion for Transfer will have no adverse effect on
9
future proceedings in this action, nor will such a stay prejudice any of the Parties.
10
11
3.
The parties in three Central District cases (identified below) have similarly agreed to
stay all proceedings pending the JPML’s ruling on the MDL Motion:
12
Danah Anderson v. Sanofi S.A., et al., Case No. 2:16-CV-06046-JAK-AS;
13
Valesta Collins v. Sanofi S.A., et al., Case No. 2:16-CV-05418-R-RAO; and
14
Maria Concepcion v. Sanofi S.A., et al., Case No. 2:16-CV-06062-SVW-GJS.
15
16
Current Status of This Action
4.
On July 20, 2016, Plaintiff Bertha Renee Schmitz (“Plaintiff”) filed her Complaint
17
and Demand for Jury Trial (“Complaint”) against Defendants Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A., and
18
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC (collectively “Defendants”) (Dkt. #1).
19
5.
On July 22, 2016, Plaintiff served Defendant Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC with her
20
Complaint. To date, Defendants Sanofi S.A. and Aventis Pharma S.A., which are both foreign
21
defendants located in France, have not been served.
22
23
24
6.
Defendant Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC’s deadline to answer, move, or otherwise
respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint is currently September 14, 2016.
7.
In addition, the following early case deadlines currently exist: (1) the Parties’ last
25
day to meet-and-confer regarding ADR process, file ADR Certifications, and file either Stipulation
26
to ADR Process or Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference is currently October 20, 2016; (2) an
27
28
3
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR STAY PENDING MDL TRANSFER DECISION
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-04619-MMC
1
initial Case Management Conference in this matter is set for November 18, 2016; and (3) the
2
attendant Joint CMC Statement is currently due November 10, 2016.
3
Stipulated Stay
4
8.
For the reasons stated herein, the Parties stipulate to and request a stay of this action
5
for all purposes, including without limitation all responsive pleading, discovery, hearings, and other
6
deadlines, to permit a ruling on the Motion for Transfer currently pending before the Judicial Panel
7
on Multidistrict Litigation, which ruling the Parties expect to receive during the first two weeks of
8
October 2016. The Parties agree that this stay shall remain in full force and effect until lifted by
9
court order upon motion of one or more Parties or as otherwise ordered by this Court or the MDL
10
Court following transfer to an MDL.
11
9.
No previous time modification has been requested by the Parties or ordered by the
12
Court in this case. Granting this request will have no adverse effect on future proceedings in this
13
matter.
14
Dated: September 8, 2016
GIBBS LAW GROUP
15
By: /s/ Karen Barth Menzies
KAREN BATH MENZIES
ERIC H. GIBBS
AMY M. ZEMAN
16
17
Attorneys for PLAINTIFF
18
19
Dated: September 8, 2016
SHOOK, HARDY & BACON L.L.P.
20
21
By: /s/ _G. Gregg Webb_________________
G. GREGG WEBB
22
Attorneys for Defendant
SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR STAY PENDING MDL TRANSFER DECISION
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-04619-MMC
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the parties shall file, no later than October 28, 2016, a
4
joint status report to apprise the Court of the status of the Motion to Transfer, if the action
has not been transferred by said date.
5
6
7
8
DATED: September 9, 2016
________________________________________
_ _____
______________________________
_ __ ___
_
HONORABLE MAXINE M.CHESN
M.CHESNEY
HONORABLE
ONO
HE N
E
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR STAY PENDING MDL TRANSFER DECISION
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-04619-MMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?