Dransfield v. Ross Stores, Inc.

Filing 13

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 12 Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Proposed Order filed by Ross Stores, Inc. Copy mailed to Pro Se Plaintiff Steven Dransfield. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/22/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2017)

Download PDF
1 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP A Limited Liability Partnership 2 Including Professional Corporations 3 BABAK YOUSEFZADEH, Cal. Bar No. 235974 byousefzadeh@sheppardmullin.com 4 AMANDA E. BECKWITH, Cal. Bar No. 312967 ABeckwith@sheppardmullin .com 5 Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor 6 San Francisco, California 94111 -4109 Telephone: 415.434.9100 7 Facsimile: 415.434.3947 8 Attorneys for Defendant 9 ROSS STORES, INC. 10 STEVEN DRANSFIELD 309 4 St. #109 11 Oakland, California 94607 Telephone: 510-504-3982 12 Plaintiff, In Pro Se UTSRPONMLIHGFEDCA 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 STEVEN DRANSFIELD, Plaintiff, 18 19 Case No.: 3:16-cv-04681-EMC Judge: Hon. Edward M Chen rhTONJI JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL [PROPOSED) ORDER v. 20 ROSS STORES, INC., Defendant. 21 COMPLAINT FILED: AUGUST 15,2016 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SMRH:226118617.1 JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 TO THE COURT, PLAINTIFF, AND HIS ATTORNEY OF RECORD: 2 Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 41(a)(1)(A), Plaintiff Steven Dransfield ("Plaintiff) 3 and Defendant Ross Stores, Inc. ("Defendant" or "Ross") (individually "Party," and 4 collectively "Parties"), both hereby stipulate (Defendant through their undersigned 5 counsel, and Plaintiff pro se) as follows: WHEREAS, Plaintiff initially filed a complaint before this Court on August 15, 6 7 2016; 8 WHEREAS, after filing of the complaint, the Parties agreed to submit this matter to 9 mediation and arbitration, pursuant to a Dispute Resolution Agreement ("DRA") between 10 them; 11 WHEREAS, pursuant to the Parties' agreement, the Court stayed the instant 12 proceedings, ordered the matter to resolution through the Parties' DRA; 13 WHEREAS, the Parties participated in a private mediation session with Jeffrey A. 14 Ross on February 9, 2017; and 15 WHEREAS, the Parties have reached a settlement of the above-captioned action in 16 its entirety and have come to terms on a written settlement agreement February 9, 2017 17 resulting in a dismissal of the above-captioned action with prejudice; 18 NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the Parties, through 19 their undersigned counsel, that the above-captioned action shall be dismissed in its entirety 20 with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 41(a)( 1)(A)(ii). rhTONJI 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SMRH226118617.1 rh JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER IT IS SO STIPULATED. 2 3 Dated: February 16, 2017 4 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON 5 LLP 6 By 7 uOUSEFZADEH )A BECKWITH Attorneys for Defendant ROSS STORES. INC. 8 9 10 Dated: February 16, 2017 11 By 12 EN DRANSFIELD Pro Se 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2SMRH:226118617.1 JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER [PROPOSED] ORDER zywvutsrponmlkjihgfedcbaZYWVUTSRPONML IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to the Parties' Stipulation that this entire action is hereby dismissed as to all parties with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 2/22/2017 UNIT ED Dated: S DISTRICT TE C TA D RDERE OO IT IS S RT U O S IT IS SO ORDERED. R NIA 41 (a)( 1)(A)(ii). A H ER LI RT FO NO n M. Che Edward HON.eEDWARD M. CHEN Judg UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE N F D IS T IC T O R C -3SMRH:226118617.1 JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?