Dransfield v. Ross Stores, Inc.
Filing
13
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 12 Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Proposed Order filed by Ross Stores, Inc. Copy mailed to Pro Se Plaintiff Steven Dransfield. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/22/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2017)
1 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP
A Limited Liability Partnership
2
Including Professional Corporations
3 BABAK YOUSEFZADEH, Cal. Bar No. 235974
byousefzadeh@sheppardmullin.com
4 AMANDA E. BECKWITH, Cal. Bar No. 312967
ABeckwith@sheppardmullin .com
5
Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor
6 San Francisco, California 94111 -4109
Telephone: 415.434.9100
7 Facsimile:
415.434.3947
8
Attorneys for Defendant
9 ROSS STORES, INC.
10 STEVEN DRANSFIELD
309 4 St. #109
11 Oakland, California 94607
Telephone: 510-504-3982
12
Plaintiff, In Pro Se UTSRPONMLIHGFEDCA
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17 STEVEN DRANSFIELD,
Plaintiff,
18
19
Case No.: 3:16-cv-04681-EMC
Judge: Hon. Edward M Chen rhTONJI
JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
[PROPOSED) ORDER
v.
20 ROSS STORES, INC.,
Defendant.
21
COMPLAINT FILED: AUGUST 15,2016
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SMRH:226118617.1
JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
TO THE COURT, PLAINTIFF, AND HIS ATTORNEY OF RECORD:
2
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 41(a)(1)(A), Plaintiff Steven Dransfield ("Plaintiff)
3 and Defendant Ross Stores, Inc. ("Defendant" or "Ross") (individually "Party," and
4 collectively "Parties"), both hereby stipulate (Defendant through their undersigned
5 counsel, and Plaintiff pro se) as follows:
WHEREAS, Plaintiff initially filed a complaint before this Court on August 15,
6
7 2016;
8
WHEREAS, after filing of the complaint, the Parties agreed to submit this matter to
9 mediation and arbitration, pursuant to a Dispute Resolution Agreement ("DRA") between
10 them;
11
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Parties' agreement, the Court stayed the instant
12 proceedings, ordered the matter to resolution through the Parties' DRA;
13
WHEREAS, the Parties participated in a private mediation session with Jeffrey A.
14 Ross on February 9, 2017; and
15
WHEREAS, the Parties have reached a settlement of the above-captioned action in
16 its entirety and have come to terms on a written settlement agreement February 9, 2017
17 resulting in a dismissal of the above-captioned action with prejudice;
18
NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the Parties, through
19 their undersigned counsel, that the above-captioned action shall be dismissed in its entirety
20 with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 41(a)( 1)(A)(ii). rhTONJI
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SMRH226118617.1
rh
JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
2
3 Dated: February 16, 2017
4
SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON
5
LLP
6
By
7
uOUSEFZADEH
)A BECKWITH
Attorneys for Defendant
ROSS STORES. INC.
8
9
10 Dated: February 16, 2017
11
By
12
EN DRANSFIELD
Pro Se
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2SMRH:226118617.1
JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
[PROPOSED] ORDER zywvutsrponmlkjihgfedcbaZYWVUTSRPONML
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to the Parties' Stipulation that this entire
action is hereby dismissed as to all parties with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc.
2/22/2017
UNIT
ED
Dated:
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
D
RDERE
OO
IT IS S
RT
U
O
S
IT IS SO ORDERED.
R NIA
41 (a)( 1)(A)(ii).
A
H
ER
LI
RT
FO
NO
n
M. Che
Edward
HON.eEDWARD M. CHEN
Judg
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
-3SMRH:226118617.1
JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?