Bristow v. SunPower Corporation et al

Filing 57

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 56 CONTINUING DATE FOR FILING OF CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT AND MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 2/23/17. (clS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2017)

1

4

Rosemary M. Rivas (Bar No. 209147)
[e-mail]
LEVI & KORSINSKY LLP
44 Montgomery Street, Suite 650
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

5

Liaison Counsel

2
3

6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 IN RE SUNPOWER CORPORATION
SECURITIES LITIGATION
11
12
13

Master File No. 3:16-cv-04710-RS
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER CONTINUING DATE FOR
FILING OF CONSOLIDATED
COMPLAINT AND MODIFYING
BRIEFING SCHEDULE

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 3:16-cv-04710-RS

STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

WHEREAS, on January 13, 2017, the Court entered the Parties’ stipulation setting the

2 deadline for Plaintiffs to file the consolidated complaint on March 9, 2017 and a briefing schedule;
3

WHEREAS, Lead Counsel in this matter, Brower Piven, A Professional Corporation,

4 require an additional three weeks to prepare and file the consolidated complaint due to medical
5 circumstances affecting Mr. Daniel Kuznicki (the primary attorney on this matter for Brower
6 Piven) and his family, including the recent birth of his child and, in connection therewith, an
7 emergency surgery;
8

WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred regarding the current schedule;

9

ACCORDINGLY, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE COURT, THE PARTIES

10 HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE as follows:
11

1.

Plaintiffs shall file the consolidated complaint by March 31, 2017.

12

2.

Defendants shall file a response to the complaint by June 5, 2017.

13

3.

Should Defendants filed a motion to dismiss on or before June 5, 2017, Plaintiffs

14 shall have 60 days to file an opposition, and Defendants shall have 30 days to file a reply brief.
15

4.

The Parties shall meet and confer as to an appropriate hearing date.

16 DATED: February 23, 2017
17

LEVI & KORSINSKY LLP

18

By: /s/ Rosemary M. Rivas
Rosemary M. Rivas

19

Liaison Counsel

20 DATED: February 23, 2017

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI

21

By: /s/ Steven Mark Schatz
Steven Mark Schatz
Diane Marie Walters

22
23

Counsel for Defendants

24
25
26
27
28
- 2Case No. 3:16-cv-04710-RS

STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER

[PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2

Based on the foregoing stipulation and good cause being shown, the Court hereby

3 GRANTS the parties’ Stipulation. The Court hereby orders as follows:
4
1.
Plaintiffs shall file the consolidated complaint by March 31, 2017.
5

2.

Defendants shall file a response to the complaint by June 5, 2017.

6

3.

Should Defendants filed a motion to dismiss on or before June 5, 2017, Plaintiffs

7 shall have 60 days to file an opposition, and Defendants shall have 30 days to file a reply brief.
8
4.
The Parties shall meet and confer as to an appropriate hearing date.
9 IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
11 Date: 2/23/17
12

___________________________
HON. RICHARD SEEBORG
United States District Court Judge

13
FILER’S ATTESTATION

14
15

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1 regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that

16 the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from all signatories.
17

/s/ Rosemary M. Rivas
Rosemary M. Rivas

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

- 3Case No. 3:16-cv-04710-RS

STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER