Green v. Colvin

Filing 22

ORDER granting 21 STIPULATION to Extend Time for Plaintiff to File Reply. Reply due by 4/18/2017. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 03/07/2017. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/7/2017)

1
2
3
4
5

JESSICA REDDITT, State Bar No. 264673
BAY AREA LEGAL AID
1735 Telegraph Ave.
Oakland, CA 94612
[e-mail]
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorney for Plaintiff

6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION

10

Sharon Bonita Green,

11

Plaintiff,

12

v.

13

NANCY A. BERRYHILL, 1
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

14
15

CIVIL NO. 3:16-cv-04716
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE
REPLY IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S
CROSS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
AND OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Defendant

16
17
18

The parties hereto, by and through their undersigned attorneys, hereby stipulate that Plaintiff, Sharon

19
20

Bonita Green, shall have until April 18, 2017, in which to file and serve a reply in this action. This is the second

21

stipulation for extended time requested by Plaintiff in this matter and is necessary to allow Plaintiff sufficient time to

22

review Defendant’s brief and draft a response.

23
24
25

1

Nancy Berryhill is now the Acting Commission of Social Security. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure, Nancy A. Berryhill should be substituted for Acting Commissioner Carolyn W. Colvin as the
defendant in this suit. No further action needs to be taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of
section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE
1
REPLY IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S CROSS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND
OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
3:16-cv-04716

1
2

The parties further stipulate that the Court’s Procedural Order for Social Security Review Actions shall be
modified accordingly.

3
4

Dated: March 3, 2017

By:____/s/____________________

5

Jessica Redditt

6

Attorney for Plaintiff

7
8

Dated: March 3, 2017

By: _____/s/_(as authorized via email March 3, 2017)
Richard Rodriguez on behalf of Marcelo Illarmo

9

Special Assistant United States Attorney

10
11
12

[PROPOSED] ORDER:

13

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED

14
15

By:
Dated:

3/7/2017

________________________

Hon. William H. Orrick, United States District Judge

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE
REPLY IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S CROSS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND
OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
3:16-cv-04716

2