Version2 Technology, Inc. v. NeilMed Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Filing 63

STIPULATION OF DIMISSAL AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 3/31/2017. (rxmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

OGLOZA FORTNEY LLP
Darius Ogloza (SBN 176983)
[e-mail]
David Fortney (SBN 226767)
[e-mail]
535 Pacific Avenue, Suite 201
San Francisco, California 94133
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
VERSION2 TECHNOLOGY, INC.

8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12

VERSION2 TECHNOLOGY, INC., a
Delaware Company,

13

Plaintiff,

CASE NO. 3:16-CV-04720-LB

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER

14
v.
15
16
17

NEILMED PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., a
California corporation,
Defendant.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
OGLOZA FORTNEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2
3

Plaintiff Version2 Technology, Inc. (“Version2”) and Defendant NeilMed
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“NeilMed”) stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, on August 17, 2016, Version2 filed its complaint for (1) attempted

4

monopolization in violation of Section 2 of the Sherman Act, (2) declaratory relief, and (3)

5

violation of California Business and Professions Code § 17200, et seq.; and

6
7
8
9

WHEREAS, the parties have engaged in settlement discussions, and have reached an
agreement as to a settlement.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties, through their respective counsel of record, hereby
respectfully request that this Court dismiss this action with prejudice against Defendant NeilMed

10

pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A).

11

SO STIPULATED.

12
13

Dated: February 2, 2017

FREEDMAN + TAITELMAN LLP

14
By:

15
16
17

/s/ Steven Stiglitz
Michael Taitelman
Steven Stiglitz
Attorneys for Defendant
NeilMed Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

18
19
20
21
22

Dated: February 2, 2017

OGLOZA FORTNEY LLP
By:

/s/ Darius Ogloza
Darius Ogloza
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Version2 Technology, Inc.

23
24
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

[PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2

Having considered the stipulated request of the parties to dismiss the August 17, 2016

3

complaint, and finding GOOD CAUSE therefor, the Court hereby issues the following Order:

4
5
6

The action is dismissed with prejudice as against Defendant NeilMed pursuant to FRCP
41(a)(1)(A).

7
8
9
10
11
12

IT IS SO ORDERED.
3/31/2017
DATED: _____________________, 2016

______________________________________
The Honorable Laurel Beeler
Judge of the Northern District of California

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER