Autodesk, Inc. v. Alter et al

Filing 181

JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 09/14/2018. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2018)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15

AUTODESK, INC.,
Plaintiff-Counterdefendant,
v.
JOSEPH ALTER, INC. and
JOSEPH ALTER,
Defendants-Counterplaintiffs.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JUDGMENT
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-04722-WHO

Case No.

3:16-cv-04722-WHO

JUDGMENT

The Honorable William H. Orrick

1

In accordance with the Court’s March 15, 2018 Order Regarding Cross-Motions for

2

Summary Judgment, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Final Judgment is entered in favor of

3

Plaintiff-Counterdefendant Autodesk, Inc., and against Defendants-Counterplaintiffs Joseph

4

Alter, Inc. and Joseph Alter, on the following counts:

5

•

Autodesk’s First Count (Declaration of License, Release, and/or Covenant); and

6

•

Alter’s First Count (Declaratory Judgment of No License, Release, or Covenantnot-to-Sue relating to the ’962 Patent in favor of Autodesk).

7
8

Based only on the entry of Final Judgment on Autodesk’s First Count seeking a Declaration of

9

License, Release, and/or Covenant, Final Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff-

10

Counterdefendant Autodesk, Inc., and against Defendants-Counterplaintiffs Joseph Alter, Inc. and

11

Joseph Alter also on Autodesk’s Second Count (Declaration of Non-Infringement of the ’962

12

Patent) and Alter’s Second Count (Infringement of the ’962 Patent by Autodesk). The Court has

13

not adjudicated the moot issue of whether any Autodesk products practice any claim of the ’962

14

Patent.

15
16
17
18

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: September 14, 2018

19

HON. WILLIAM H. ORRICK
United States District Judge

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JUDGMENT
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-04722-WHO

1