Smith v. Roberts et al

Filing 25

ORDER granting 24 MOTION for Extension of Time to File a Reply re Dispositive Motion. Reply re 16 MOTION due by 5/25/2017. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 05/12/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
12
NOEL RAY SMITH,
13
14
v.
15
16

16-cv-04764-WHO
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF
TIME TO FILE A REPLY TO
PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO THE
DISPOSITIVE MOTION

B. ROBERTS, et al.,

17

Defendants. Judge:

The Honorable William H.
Orrick
Trial Date:
n/a
Action Filed: August 18, 2016

18
19
20

For good cause appearing, Defendants’ request for an extension of time to file a reply to

21

Plaintiff’s opposition to their dispositive motion is granted. The current deadline of May 11,

22

2017, is vacated. Defendants shall file a reply to Plaintiff’s opposition to their dispositive motion

23

on or before May 25, 2017.

24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25

Dated: May 12, 2017

_____________________________
HONORABLE WILLIAM H. ORRICK
United States District Judge

26
27
28
1

Order Grant’g Defs.’ Mot. Extension Time File Reply Opp’n Dispositive Mot. (16-cv-04764-WHO)