Smith v. Roberts et al
Filing
25
ORDER granting 24 MOTION for Extension of Time to File a Reply re Dispositive Motion. Reply re 16 MOTION due by 5/25/2017. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 05/12/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
NOEL RAY SMITH,
13
14
v.
15
16
16-cv-04764-WHO
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF
TIME TO FILE A REPLY TO
PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO THE
DISPOSITIVE MOTION
B. ROBERTS, et al.,
17
Defendants. Judge:
The Honorable William H.
Orrick
Trial Date:
n/a
Action Filed: August 18, 2016
18
19
20
For good cause appearing, Defendants’ request for an extension of time to file a reply to
21
Plaintiff’s opposition to their dispositive motion is granted. The current deadline of May 11,
22
2017, is vacated. Defendants shall file a reply to Plaintiff’s opposition to their dispositive motion
23
on or before May 25, 2017.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
Dated: May 12, 2017
_____________________________
HONORABLE WILLIAM H. ORRICK
United States District Judge
26
27
28
1
Order Grant’g Defs.’ Mot. Extension Time File Reply Opp’n Dispositive Mot. (16-cv-04764-WHO)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?