Smith v. Roberts et al

Filing 25

ORDER granting 24 MOTION for Extension of Time to File a Reply re Dispositive Motion. Reply re 16 MOTION due by 5/25/2017. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 05/12/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 NOEL RAY SMITH, 13 14 v. 15 16 16-cv-04764-WHO Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO THE DISPOSITIVE MOTION B. ROBERTS, et al., 17 Defendants. Judge: The Honorable William H. Orrick Trial Date: n/a Action Filed: August 18, 2016 18 19 20 For good cause appearing, Defendants’ request for an extension of time to file a reply to 21 Plaintiff’s opposition to their dispositive motion is granted. The current deadline of May 11, 22 2017, is vacated. Defendants shall file a reply to Plaintiff’s opposition to their dispositive motion 23 on or before May 25, 2017. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: May 12, 2017 _____________________________ HONORABLE WILLIAM H. ORRICK United States District Judge 26 27 28 1 Order Grant’g Defs.’ Mot. Extension Time File Reply Opp’n Dispositive Mot. (16-cv-04764-WHO)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?