Tatcha, LLC v. Landmark Technology LLC

Filing 18

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE regarding failure to file response/opposition to 14 MOTION to Dismiss. Show Cause Response/Motion Response due by 11/23/2016. Reply due by 12/2/2016. Motion Hearing continued to 1/4/2017 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. William H. Orrick. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 11/16/2016. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2016)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

TATCHA, LLC,

Case No. 16-cv-04831-WHO

Plaintiff,
8
v.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

9
10

LANDMARK TECHNOLOGY LLC,

Re: Dkt. No. 14

Defendant.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

Plaintiff Tatcha, LLC, filed this action for declaratory judgment of invalidity and non-

13

infringement of two patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 6,289,319 (“the ’319 Patent”) and 7,010,508 (“the

14

’508 Patent”). Dkt. No. 1. Defendant Landmark Technology LLC filed a motion to dismiss or, in

15

the alternative, to transfer venue under 28 U.S.C § 1404(a) to the Southern District of California.

16

Dkt. No. 14. Plaintiff then filed an Amended Complaint, dropping its claims related to the ’508

17

Patent. Dkt. No. 15. Defendant acknowledges that its motion to dismiss focused mostly on the

18

’508 Patent claims and is now moot. Dkt. No. 16. However, plaintiff has not filed a response to

19

the motion to transfer venue, which was due November 4, 2016.

20

Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why its response has not been filed. Plaintiff

21

shall respond to this Order by filing an opposition or non-opposition to the motion to transfer

22

venue on or before November 23, 2016. Defendant’s reply (if any) must be filed on or before

23

December 2, 2016. The December 7, 2016 hearing on this matter is rescheduled for January 4,

24

2017, at 2:00 p.m.

25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 16, 2016
______________________________________
WILLIAM H. ORRICK
United States District Judge