Sabel v. City and County of San Francisco et al
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE against Plaintiff's counsel as to why monetary sanctions should not be imposed for his failure to attend today's case management conference. Show Cause Response due by 5/8/2017. Order to Show Cause Hearing and Further Case Management Conference set for 5/15/2017 at 1:30 PM, in Courtroom 12, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 05/01/17. (tehlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2017)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case No. 16-cv-04832-TEH
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, et al.,
This matter came before the Court on May 1, 2017, at 1:30 PM, for a further case
United States District Court
Northern District of California
management conference. The Court called the case at 1:45 PM and concluded the
conference at 1:53 PM. Plaintiff’s counsel, Mr. Timothy Gomes, failed to appear. The
Court’s courtroom deputy subsequently retrieved a voicemail message from Mr. Gomes,
left at 1:31 PM, stating that he was stuck in traffic, as well as another message from
Mr. Gomes’s office, left at 1:59 PM, repeating that Mr. Gomes was stuck in traffic and
adding that Mr. Gomes also had a doctor’s appointment.
Mr. Gomes is HEREBY ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to why monetary
sanctions should not be imposed for his failure to attend today’s case management
conference. He shall file a written response to this order on or before May 8, 2017, and
appear for a show cause hearing on May 15, 2017, at 1:30 PM, in Courtroom No. 12, 450
Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California. The Court will also conduct a further
case management conference at that time. If Mr. Gomes fails to file a timely statement or
appear for the hearing, this case will be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
THELTON E. HENDERSON
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?