Goodman et al v. AT&T Corp.

Filing 29

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 2/14/2018. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/14/2018)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14

PAUL GOODMAN, WILLIS KINDLEY,
TIMOTHY M. KUNST, BRIDGE RANDALL,
CLAYTON RULEBBER, XEFF SCOLARI,
DANNY LEE SISEMORE, JOHN S.
WALLIS, WILLIAM N. WEARE JR,
individually, and on behalf of all others
similarly situated.

15
Plaintiffs,
16
vs.
17
AT&T, Corp.
18
Defendants.
19

)
) Case No. 3:16-cv-04861-VC
)
)
) [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING
) ACTION
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

1

The Court, having considered the submissions of Plaintiffs Paul Goodman, Willis Kindley,

2

Timothy M. Kunst, Bridge Randall, Clayton Rulebber, Xeff Scolari, Danny Lee Sisemore, John S.

3

Wallis and William N. Weare, Jr. (collectively, “Named Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Pacific Bell

4

Telephone Company (“Pac Bell”) 1 (together, “the Parties”), and having considered the oral

5

presentation by counsel for all Parties, and good cause appearing therefor, this Court orders as

6

follows:
1.

7

The individual causes of action of Plaintiffs Paul Goodman, Willis Kindley, Timothy M.

8

Kunst, Bridge Randall, Clayton Rulebber, Xeff Scolari, Danny Lee Sisemore, John S.

9

Wallis and William N. Weare, Jr. are hereby dismissed with prejudice;
2. The class allegations asserted in the operative complaint in this action are dismissed

10

without prejudice to any unnamed class members;

11

3. Defendant shall give notice of this dismissal to the Communications Workers of

12

America: Local 9400;

13
14

4. Defendant shall file proof of service of such notice of the dismissal of this action on the

15

Communications Workers of America: Local 9400 within fourteen (14) days of entry of

16

the Order dismissing the action; and
5. Each of the Parties shall bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees.

17
18

IT IS SO ORDERED.

19
20
21

February 14, 2018
Dated: ______________________

22

___________________________________
HON. VINCE CHHABRIA

23
24
25
26
27

1

The Parties previously agreed that Defendant Pacific Bell Telephone Company erroneously was sued as “AT&T Corp.”
See Larson v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Case No. 3:16-cv-04858-VC (ECF 12, 20, 40).

28
[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION