Jolin v. AT&T Corp.

Filing 30

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 2/14/2018. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/14/2018)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

THOMAS R. JOLIN, individually, and on
behalf of all others similarly situated.
Plaintiffs,

13
14
15
16
17
18

vs.
AT&T, Corp.
Defendants.

)
) Case No. 3:16-cv-04863-VC
)
)
) [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING
) ACTION
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

1

The Court, having considered the submissions of Plaintiff Thomas R. Jolin (“Named

2

Plaintiff”) and Defendant Pacific Bell Telephone Company (“Pac Bell”) 1 (together, “the Parties”),

3

and having considered the oral presentation by counsel for all Parties, and good cause appearing

4

therefor, this Court orders as follows:
1.

5

The individual causes of action of Plaintiff Thomas R. Jolin are hereby dismissed with
prejudice;

6

2. The class allegations asserted in the operative complaint in this action are dismissed

7

without prejudice to any unnamed class members;

8

3. Defendant shall give notice of this dismissal to the Communications Workers of

9

America: Local 9400;

10
11

4. Defendant shall file proof of service of such notice of the dismissal of this action on the

12

Communications Workers of America: Local 9400 within fourteen (14) days of entry of

13

the Order dismissing the action; and
5. Each of the Parties shall bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees.

14
15

IT IS SO ORDERED.

16
17
18

February 14, 2018
Dated: ______________________

19

___________________________________
HON. VINCE CHHABRIA

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

1

The Parties previously agreed that Defendant Pacific Bell Telephone Company erroneously was sued as “AT&T Corp.”
See Larson v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Case No. 3:16-cv-04858-VC (ECF 12, 20, 40).

28
[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION