Weaver v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 43

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS. The parties agree to participate in mediation no later than 90 days from the date of this order. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 01/13/17. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/13/2017)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ANNIE G. WEAVER, CASE No C 16-04907-MMC Plaintiff(s) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS V. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; eta!., Defendant( s) Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. I 6-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: rJ Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) II Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) rJ Private ADR (;pecifY process and provider) Note: Afagistrate judges do not conducr mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge, you must file a l'v'otice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR LR. 3-5. The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: C!J the presumptive deadline (90 days .from the date of the order referring the case to ADR, unless otherwise ordered.) fl other requested deadline: Date :January I 0, 20 I 7 lsi Mark Lapham Date:January I 0, 2017 Attorney for Plaintiff Annie G. Weaver lsi Daniel A. Armstrong Attorney for Defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and The Bank of New York Mellon X IT IS SO ORDERED D D IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS: Date: January 13, 2017 U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE fmponm1.' E-jile this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: "Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Mediation" or "Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE" or ''Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Private ADR." Form ADR-Stip rev. 1-2017

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?