Weaver v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
Filing
72
ORDER MOVING THE ALLOWABLE TIME FOR PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AND DEFENDANT'S REPLY BY 3 DAYS; EXTENDING MEDIATION COMPLETION DEADLINE. Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, pl aintiff's deadline to file a response to defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings is continued to August 28, 2017, and defendant's deadline to file a reply is continued to September 4, 2017. The mediation completion deadline is extended to October 13, 2017. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 08/23/17. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
Law Offices of Mark W. Lapham (SBN 146352)
751 Diablo Rd.
Danville, CA 94526
Tel: (925) 837-9007
Fax: (925) 406-1616
Attorney for Plaintiff
ANNIE G. WEAVER
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
10
11
ANNIE G. WEAVER
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; THE BANK )
OF NEW YORK MELLON f/k/a THE BANK )
OF NEW YORK (“BNYM”), AS Trustee for )
the WORLD SAVINGS REMIC 31,
)
MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH
)
CERTIFICATES, SERIES 31 TRUST AND )
DOES 1-100, inclusive,
)
)
Defendant(s).
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 3:16-cv-04907-MMC
The Honorable Maxine Chesney
STIPULATION AND COURT ORDER
MOVING THE ALLOWABLE TIME FOR
PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
AND DEFENDANT’S REPLY BY 3 DAYS.
FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
AND DEFENDANT'S REPLY BY 3 DAYS;
EXTENDING MEDIATION COMPLETION
1
DEADLINE
Complaint Filed: June 13, 2016
23
24
STIPULATION
25
26
27
28
Plaintiff Annie G. Weaver and Defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and The Bank of New
York, as Trustee for the WORLD SAVINGS REMIC 31, MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH
CERTICATES, SERIES 31 TRUST, hereby stipulate through their respective counsel as follows:
Defendants have filed a FRCP 12(b) (6) motion to dismiss. Plaintiff and her counsel, Mark Lapham,
93000/FR2034/01833544-1 1
1
The stipulation erroneously refers to the pending motion as a motion to dismiss. (See Doc. No. 69.)
1
are in receipt of the motion and plan to file a response. The response is currently due on August 25,
2
2017. The parties through their attorneys have agreed to extend the time for Plaintiff’s response by
3
3 days and also to extend the time for Defendants to reply by 3 days. Plaintiff’s response will be
4
due on August 28, 2017 and Defendants reply shall be due on September 4th. Additionally, the
5
parties wish to extend the time to complete their mediation by 60 days to allow the Court time to
6
rule on the motion.
7
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
8
9
10
Date: August, 22, 2017
LAW OFFICES OF MARK W. LAPHAM
11
By:_____/s/ Mark W. Lapham___________
12
MARK W. LAPHAM (SBN 146352)
13
Attorney for Plaintiff
14
ANNIE G. WEAVER
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Dated: August 22, 2017
ANGLIN, FLEWELLING, RASSMUSSEN, CAMPBELL
& TRYTTEN LLP
By:____/s/ Daniel Armstrong___________
DANIEL ARMSTRONG (SBN 270175)
199 S. Los Robles Ave., Suite 600
Pasadena, CA 91101
Attorney for Defendants
Wells Fargo and
The Bank of New York Mellon
24
25
26
27
28
93000/FR2034/01833544-1 2
1
2
ORDER
for Judgment on the Pleadings
The time for Plaintiff’s to file a response to Defendants Motion to Dismiss is extended 3 days
3
until August 28th, 2017. Defendants’ time to reply to Plaintiff’s response shall also be extended 3
4
days until September 4, 2017. The time to complete mediation is also extended 60 days from August
5
14, 2017 to October 13, 2017.
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
Dated: August 23, 2017
______________________________
11
HONORABLE MAXINE CHESNEY
12
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
93000/FR2034/01833544-1 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?