Weaver v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 72

ORDER MOVING THE ALLOWABLE TIME FOR PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AND DEFENDANT'S REPLY BY 3 DAYS; EXTENDING MEDIATION COMPLETION DEADLINE. Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, pl aintiff's deadline to file a response to defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings is continued to August 28, 2017, and defendant's deadline to file a reply is continued to September 4, 2017. The mediation completion deadline is extended to October 13, 2017. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 08/23/17. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Law Offices of Mark W. Lapham (SBN 146352) 751 Diablo Rd. Danville, CA 94526 Tel: (925) 837-9007 Fax: (925) 406-1616 Attorney for Plaintiff ANNIE G. WEAVER 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 10 11 ANNIE G. WEAVER 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; THE BANK ) OF NEW YORK MELLON f/k/a THE BANK ) OF NEW YORK (“BNYM”), AS Trustee for ) the WORLD SAVINGS REMIC 31, ) MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH ) CERTIFICATES, SERIES 31 TRUST AND ) DOES 1-100, inclusive, ) ) Defendant(s). ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 3:16-cv-04907-MMC The Honorable Maxine Chesney STIPULATION AND COURT ORDER MOVING THE ALLOWABLE TIME FOR PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND DEFENDANT’S REPLY BY 3 DAYS. FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AND DEFENDANT'S REPLY BY 3 DAYS; EXTENDING MEDIATION COMPLETION 1 DEADLINE Complaint Filed: June 13, 2016 23 24 STIPULATION 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff Annie G. Weaver and Defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and The Bank of New York, as Trustee for the WORLD SAVINGS REMIC 31, MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTICATES, SERIES 31 TRUST, hereby stipulate through their respective counsel as follows: Defendants have filed a FRCP 12(b) (6) motion to dismiss. Plaintiff and her counsel, Mark Lapham, 93000/FR2034/01833544-1 1 1 The stipulation erroneously refers to the pending motion as a motion to dismiss. (See Doc. No. 69.) 1 are in receipt of the motion and plan to file a response. The response is currently due on August 25, 2 2017. The parties through their attorneys have agreed to extend the time for Plaintiff’s response by 3 3 days and also to extend the time for Defendants to reply by 3 days. Plaintiff’s response will be 4 due on August 28, 2017 and Defendants reply shall be due on September 4th. Additionally, the 5 parties wish to extend the time to complete their mediation by 60 days to allow the Court time to 6 rule on the motion. 7 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 8 9 10 Date: August, 22, 2017 LAW OFFICES OF MARK W. LAPHAM 11 By:_____/s/ Mark W. Lapham___________ 12 MARK W. LAPHAM (SBN 146352) 13 Attorney for Plaintiff 14 ANNIE G. WEAVER 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Dated: August 22, 2017 ANGLIN, FLEWELLING, RASSMUSSEN, CAMPBELL & TRYTTEN LLP By:____/s/ Daniel Armstrong___________ DANIEL ARMSTRONG (SBN 270175) 199 S. Los Robles Ave., Suite 600 Pasadena, CA 91101 Attorney for Defendants Wells Fargo and The Bank of New York Mellon 24 25 26 27 28 93000/FR2034/01833544-1 2 1 2 ORDER for Judgment on the Pleadings The time for Plaintiff’s to file a response to Defendants Motion to Dismiss is extended 3 days 3 until August 28th, 2017. Defendants’ time to reply to Plaintiff’s response shall also be extended 3 4 days until September 4, 2017. The time to complete mediation is also extended 60 days from August 5 14, 2017 to October 13, 2017. 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 Dated: August 23, 2017 ______________________________ 11 HONORABLE MAXINE CHESNEY 12 U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 93000/FR2034/01833544-1 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?