Ojmar US, LLC v. Security People, Inc. et al

Filing 32

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 27 Stipulation Modifying Briefing Schedule re 21 MOTION to Dismiss. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/10/2016)

Download PDF
1 Roderick M. Thompson (State Bar No. 96192) rthompson@fbm.com 2 Jim Day (State Bar No. 197158) jday@fbm.com 3 Daniel C. Callaway (State Bar No. 262675) dcallaway@fbm.com 4 Farella Braun + Martel LLP 235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor 5 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 954-4400 6 Facsimile: (415) 954-4480 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff OJMAR US, LLC 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 OJMAR U.S., LLC, Case No. 16-4948-HSG 12 STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING MOTION TO DISMISS BRIEFING SCHEDULE 13 Plaintiff, vs. 14 SECURITY PEOPLE, INC., and ASIL GOKCEBAY (a.k.a. BILL GORDON), 15 Defendants. 16 Hearing Date: Time: Judge: Courtroom: December 29, 2016 2:00 p.m. Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam 10 17 Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12, Plaintiff Ojmar U.S., LLC (“Ojmar”) and 18 Defendants Security People, Inc. and Asil Gokcebay (herein referred collectively as “SPI”) by and 19 through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: 20 WHEREAS, on October 13, 2016, Ojmar filed its First Amended Complaint for Antitrust 21 Violations, Unfair Competition, and Related Claims (“First Amended Complaint”); 22 WHEREAS, on October 31, 2016, SPI filed Defendants Security People, Inc. and Asil 23 Gokcebay’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Ojmar U.S., LLC’s First Amended Complaint (“Motion 24 to Dismiss”), which is set for hearing on December 29, 2016 (ECF No. 21); 25 WHEREAS, pursuant to Northern District of California Local Rule 7-3, Ojmar has until 26 November 14, 2016 to file a brief in opposition to the Motion to Dismiss, and SPI has until 27 November 21, 2016 to file reply brief to Ojmar’s brief in opposition to the Motion to Dismiss; 28 Farella Braun + Martel LLP 235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor San Francisco, California 94104 (415) 954-4400 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE / Case No. 16-4948-HSG 1 33025\5673455.1 1 WHEREAS, Ojmar requested of SPI an extension of time until November 28, 2016 to 2 have reasonable time to consider and file a brief in opposition to the Motion to Dismiss; 3 WHEREAS, SPI requested of Ojmar until December 12, 2016 to file a reply brief to 4 Ojmar’s brief in opposition to the Motion to Dismiss; 5 WHEREAS, the extended briefing schedule will not disturb the current December 29, 6 2016 hearing date on the Motion to Dismiss; 7 WHEREAS, Ojmar and SPI agree to the extensions; and 8 WHEREAS, the extension will not alter any event or deadline already fixed by Court 9 order; 10 ACCORDINGLY, with the Court’s permission, the parties agree that the remaining 11 briefing schedule for the Motion to Dismiss should be changed to: 12 November 28, 2016: deadline for Ojmar to file a brief in opposition to Motion to Dismiss; 13 December 12, 2016: deadline for SPI to file a reply brief to Ojmar’ brief in opposition to 14 the Motion to Dismiss; 15 December 29, 2016: Motion to Dismiss filed by SPI is currently noticed to be heard on 16 this date. 17 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 18 / / / 19 / / / 20 / / / 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Farella Braun + Martel LLP 235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor San Francisco, California 94104 (415) 954-4400 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE / Case No. 16-4948-HSG 2 33025\5673455.1 1 DATED: November 8, 2016 FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP 2 By: 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 /s/ Daniel C. Callaway Roderick M. Thompson (State Bar No. 96192) rthompson@fbm.com Jim Day (State Bar No. 197158) jday@fbm.com Daniel C. Callaway (CA SBN 262675) dcallaway@fbm.com Farella Braun + Martel LLP 235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 954-4400 Facsimile: (415) 954-4480 Attorneys for Plaintiff OJMAR US, LLC 10 GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 11 12 /s/ Forrest A. Hainline III Forrest A. Hainline III fhainline@goodwinlaw.com David J. Zimmer dzimmer@goodwinlaw.com GOODWIN PROCTER LLP Three Embarcadero Center 24th Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Tel.: +1 415 733 6000 Fax.: +1 415 677 9041 Attorneys for SECURITY PEOPLE, INC., and ASIL GOKCEBAY 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Farella Braun + Martel LLP 235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor San Francisco, California 94104 (415) 954-4400 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE / Case No. 16-4948-HSG 3 33025\5673455.1 1 2 FILER’S ATTESTATION In compliance with Civil L.R. Rule 5-1, I hereby attest that all parties have concurred in 3 the filing of this Stipulation and (Proposed) Order. 4 Dated: November 8, 2016 5 /s/ Daniel C. Callaway Daniel C. Callaway 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Farella Braun + Martel LLP 235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor San Francisco, California 94104 (415) 954-4400 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE / Case No. 16-4948-HSG 4 33025\5673455.1 ORDER 1 2 In accordance with a stipulation between the parties, IT IS ORDERED that the schedule in 3 this case be amended as follows: 4 There being a showing of good cause based on the parties’ stipulation, the briefing 5 schedule regarding Defendants Security People, Inc. and Asil Gokcebay’s Motion to Dismiss 6 Plaintiff Ojmar U.S., LLC’s First Amended Complaint is set forth below: 7 1) Ojmar’s Opposition Brief is due on November 28, 2016; 8 2) SPI’s Reply Brief is due on December 12, 2016; 9 3) A hearing shall be heard on December 29, 2016. 10 11 12 DATED: November 10, 2016 _________ The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam Jr. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Farella Braun + Martel LLP 235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor San Francisco, California 94104 (415) 954-4400 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE / Case No. 16-4948-HSG 5 33025\5673455.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?