Ojmar US, LLC v. Security People, Inc. et al

Filing 42

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 41 Stipulation Selecting Private ADR. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2016)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DIS1RICT OF CALIFORNIA Ojmar U.S., LLC, CASE No C V-16-4948-HSG Plaintiffts) v. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS Security People, Inc., et al Defendant( s) Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Im Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) 11!1 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) !ii Private ADR (specify process and provider) Private mediation, Retired Judge Edward Infante. The mediation will be held on January 16, 2017. Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge, you must file a Notice ofNeed for ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: ~ the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date ofthe order referring the case to ADR, unless otherwise ordered.) IOI other requested deadline: Date: 12/15/2016 /s/ Roderick M. Thompson (SBN 96192) Date: 12/15/2016 /s/ Forrest A. Hainline III (SBN 64166) Attorney for Plaintiff Attorney for Defendant X D IT IS SO ORDERED D IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS: Date: 12/16/2016 U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: "Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Mediation" or "Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE" or "Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Private ADR. " FormADR-Sti.p rev. 11-2016

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?