Ojmar US, LLC v. Security People, Inc. et al

Filing 65

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Denying Plaintiff's 62 Administrative Motion and Setting Schedule. Close of Fact Discovery due by 6/26/2017; Designation of Experts due by 7/11/2017; Rebuttal Reports due by 8/25/2017; Close of Expert Discovery due by 9/11/2017; Motion Hearing set for 9/28/2017 02:00 PM before Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.; Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/2/2018 03:00 PM; Jury Selection /Jury Trial (7 Day) set for 1/16/2018 08:30 AM before Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/21/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 OJMAR US, LLC, Case No. 16-cv-04948-HSG Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION AND SETTING SCHEDULE 8 v. 9 10 SECURITY PEOPLE, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 62 Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 On February 15, 2017, Plaintiff Ojmar U.S., LLC filed an administrative motion requesting 12 13 that the Court set a case management schedule. Dkt. No. 62. Defendants Security People, Inc. 14 and Asil Gokcebay neither opposed nor joined Plaintiff’s administrative motion. Dkt. No. 64. 15 Having reviewed Plaintiff’s motion and the proposed schedule therein, the Court DENIES the 16 motion and instead SETS the following schedule pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17 16(b): 18 Litigation Event Fact Discovery Cutoff Exchange Opening Expert Reports Exchange Rebuttal Expert Reports Expert Discovery Cutoff Dispositive Motion Hearing Deadline Pretrial Conference Jury Trial (7 days) 19 20 21 22 23 Deadline June 26, 2017 July 11, 2017 August 25, 2017 September 11, 2017 September 28, 2017, at 2:00 p.m. January 2, 2018, at 3:00 p.m. January 16, 2018, at 8:30 a.m. 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 2/21/2017 ______________________________________ HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?