Ojmar US, LLC v. Security People, Inc. et al
Filing
65
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Denying Plaintiff's 62 Administrative Motion and Setting Schedule. Close of Fact Discovery due by 6/26/2017; Designation of Experts due by 7/11/2017; Rebuttal Reports due by 8/25/2017; Close of Expert Discovery due by 9/11/2017; Motion Hearing set for 9/28/2017 02:00 PM before Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.; Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/2/2018 03:00 PM; Jury Selection /Jury Trial (7 Day) set for 1/16/2018 08:30 AM before Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/21/2017)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
OJMAR US, LLC,
Case No. 16-cv-04948-HSG
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION AND
SETTING SCHEDULE
8
v.
9
10
SECURITY PEOPLE, INC., et al.,
Re: Dkt. No. 62
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
On February 15, 2017, Plaintiff Ojmar U.S., LLC filed an administrative motion requesting
12
13
that the Court set a case management schedule. Dkt. No. 62. Defendants Security People, Inc.
14
and Asil Gokcebay neither opposed nor joined Plaintiff’s administrative motion. Dkt. No. 64.
15
Having reviewed Plaintiff’s motion and the proposed schedule therein, the Court DENIES the
16
motion and instead SETS the following schedule pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
17
16(b):
18
Litigation Event
Fact Discovery Cutoff
Exchange Opening Expert Reports
Exchange Rebuttal Expert Reports
Expert Discovery Cutoff
Dispositive Motion Hearing Deadline
Pretrial Conference
Jury Trial (7 days)
19
20
21
22
23
Deadline
June 26, 2017
July 11, 2017
August 25, 2017
September 11, 2017
September 28, 2017, at 2:00 p.m.
January 2, 2018, at 3:00 p.m.
January 16, 2018, at 8:30 a.m.
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 2/21/2017
______________________________________
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?