Crittenden v. Starbucks Corporation

Filing 35

STIPULATION AND ORDER; Case No. 16-cv-05049-TEH is DISMISSED without prejudice and Defendant shall have 14 days to respond to the First Amended Class Action Complaint in Case No. 16-cv-01306-TEH. ***Civil Case Terminated.. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 9/20/16. (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/20/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.
L. Timothy Fisher (State Bar No. 191626)
1990 North California Boulevard, Suite 940
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.
Scott A. Bursor (State Bar No. 276006)
888 Seventh Avenue
New York, NY 10019
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
MILITARY JUSTICE ATTORNEYS, PLLC
Gerald Healy (admitted pro hac vice)
219 Scott Street, PMB 315
Beaufort, SC 29902
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
MILITARY JUSTICE ATTORNEYS, PLLC
John Hafemann (State Bar No. 238758)
21 W. Park Avenue
Savannah, GA 31401
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
(Additional Counsel Listed on Signature Page)

18
19

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

20

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

21
22

SIERA STRUMLAUF and BENJAMIN
ROBLES, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated,

23
Plaintiffs,
24

Case No. 16-CV-01306-TEH
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING THE FILING OF
FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION
COMPLAINT

v.
25
STARBUCKS CORPORATION,
26
Defendant.
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE THE FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
CASE NO. 16-CV-01306-TEH

1

Plaintiffs Siera Strumlauf and Benjamin Robles (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and Defendant

2

Starbucks Corporation (“Starbucks”), by and through their counsel of record, enter into the

3

following stipulation, based on the recitals below:

4
5
6

WHEREAS, on March 16, 2016, Plaintiffs filed their initial Class Action Complaint (see
Dkt. No. 1);
WHEREAS, on May 10, 2016, plaintiff Brittany Crittenden (“Crittenden”) filed her Class

7

Action Complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (see Crittenden

8

v. Starbucks Corporation, Case No. 16-cv-03496 (S.D.N.Y.)), which was transferred to this

9

District under Case No. 16-cv-05049 and subsequently assigned to this Court;

10

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Crittenden wish to file a First Amended Class Action Complaint

11

that includes Crittenden as a Plaintiff in this case and brings claims under New York General

12

Business Law §§ 349, 350 and Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, Fla. Stat. §§

13

501.201, et seq.;

14

WHEREAS, counsel for Plaintiffs provided a draft of the proposed First Amended Class

15

Action Complaint to counsel for Starbucks to obtain its consent to the filing of the First Amended

16

Class Action Complaint, a copy is attached hereto as Exhibit A;

17
18
19

WHEREAS, Starbucks has advised that it does not object to the filing of the proposed First
Amended Class Action Complaint, in form of Exhibit A hereto.
WHEREAS, upon the filing of the First Amended Class Action Complaint, Crittenden

20

agrees that this Court may dismiss without prejudice the complaint in the action styled as

21

Crittenden v. Starbucks Corporation, Case No. 16-cv-05049-TEH (N.D. Cal.);

22

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate, subject to Court approval, that Plaintiffs

23

shall have leave to file the proposed First Amended Class Action Complaint attached hereto as

24

Exhibit A.

25

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE THE FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
CASE NO. 16-CV-01306-TEH

1

1

Dated: September 16, 2016

2

Respectfully submitted,
BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.

3

By:

4

/s/ L. Timothy Fisher
L. Timothy Fisher

L. Timothy Fisher (State Bar No. 191626)
1990 North California Boulevard, Suite 940
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]

5
6
7
8

BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.
Scott A. Bursor (State Bar No. 276006)
888 Seventh Avenue
New York, NY 10019
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]

9
10
11
12

MILITARY JUSTICE ATTORNEYS, PLLC
Gerald Healy (admitted pro hac vice)
219 Scott Street, PMB 315
Beaufort, SC 29902
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]

13
14
15
16

MILITARY JUSTICE ATTORNEYS, PLLC
John Hafemann (State Bar No. 238758)
21 W. Park Avenue
Savannah, GA 31401
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]

17
18
19
20

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Strumlauf and Robles

21
22
23

SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON
LLP

24

By:

25
26
27
28

Dated: September 16, 2016

/s/ Robert J. Guite
Robert J. Guite

Robert J. Guite (State Bar No. 244590)
Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-4109
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE THE FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
CASE NO. 16-CV-01306-TEH

2

1

E-Mail: [e-mail]

2

SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON
LLP
Fred R. Puglisi (State Bar No. 121822)
Sascha Henry (State Bar No. 191914)
Robin A. Achen (State Bar No. 287033)
333 South Hope Street, 43rd Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1422
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

3
4
5
6
7
8

Attorneys for Defendant Starbucks Corporation
9
10
11
ATTESTATION

12

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1, I, L. Timothy Fisher, attest that all signatories listed, and
13

on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concur in the stipulation’s content and have authorized the

14
stipulation.
15
16
17

/s/ L. Timothy Fisher
L. Timothy Fisher

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE THE FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
CASE NO. 16-CV-01306-TEH

3

1

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED; Case No. 16-cv-05049-TEH

2

14
(N.D. Cal.) is DISMISSED without prejudice and Defendant shall have __ days to respond to the

3

First Amended Class Action Complaint.

4
5
6

9/20
Dated: __________________, 2016

THELTON E. HENDERSON
United States District Judge

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE THE FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
CASE NO. 16-CV-01306-TEH

4