Justin Emerson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

Filing 27

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 25 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: STANDARD OF REVIEW filed by Justin Emerson. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 21, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/21/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Brian H. Kim (State Bar No. 215492) Emily A. Bolt (State Bar No. 253109) James P. Keenley (State Bar No. 253106) BOLT KEENLEY KIM LLP 1010 Grayson Street, Suite Three Berkeley, California 94710 Phone: (510) 225-0696 Fax: (510) 225-1095 Attorneys for Plaintiff 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JUSTIN EMERSON, Plaintiff, 12 13 v. 14 METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 3:16-cv-05093 JST JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: STANDARD OF REVIEW JOINT STIPULATION The parties have reached the following agreement which they jointly request be entered as an order of this Court governing further proceedings: (1) The parties agree that the standard of review applicable to the Plaintiff’s claim is de novo for purposes of the trial of this case only; (2) Metropolitan Life Insurance Company’s (“MetLife”) stipulation to de novo 27 standard of review in this case is for the purposes of the trial of this case only and without 28 {03938587.2}Case No.: 3:16-cv05093 JST 1 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: STANDARD OF REVIEW 1 reference to the appropriate standard of review in any other case. MetLife’s stipulation on the 2 standard of review should not be construed as a concession that a de novo standard of review is 3 applicable in any other pending cases against MetLife. 4 5 Dated: February 16, 2017 BOLT KEENLEY KIM LLP 6 7 By: /s/ Brian H. Kim Brian H. Kim Attorneys for Plaintiff 8 9 10 Dated: February 16, 2017 MAYNARD, COOPER & GALE, LLP 11 12 By: /s/ Linda B. Oliver Linda B. Oliver Alexandra Drury Attorneys for Defendant METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 13 14 15 16 17 [PROPOSED] ORDER 18 19 Pursuant to the stipulation set forth above, IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 21 Dated: February 21, 2017 Hon. Jon S. Tigar United States District Court 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 {03938587.2}Case No.: 3:16-cv05093 JST 2 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: STANDARD OF REVIEW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?