Diltz v. Convergint Technologies LLC

Filing 19

ORDER APPROVING 17 STIPULATION SELECTING MEDIATION by Hon. William Alsup. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2016).

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HUGH DILTZ

,

CASE No C 3:16-cv-05152-WHA

Plaintiff(s)
v.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

CONVERGINT TECHNOLOGIES LLC, et al.
,
Defendant(s)
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following
stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the
following ADR process:
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
■

Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
Private ADR (specify process and provider)

Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct
mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an
early settlement conference with a Magistrate
Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this
form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR
L.R. 3-5.

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR,
unless otherwise ordered. )
■

other requested deadline:

Parties filed Notice of Settlement on 11/16/16 (attached). ADR deadline requested
within 90 days if dismissal is not filed.

/s/ Jamie McCrary

Date: November 23, 2016
Date: November 23, 2016

Attorney for Plaintiff
/s/ Allison Crow
Attorney for Defendant

x IT IS SO ORDERED
IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS:
Date: November 29, 2016.
U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE