Daugherty v. SolarCity Corporation

Filing 29

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Alsup on 12/7/16. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
BREANA DAUGHERTY,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14

Plaintiff,
v.
SOLAR CITY CORP,

ORDER DENYING MOTION
TO DISMISS AS MOOT

Defendant.
/

15
16

No. C 16-05155 WHA

Defendant moved to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction (Dkt. No. 16). While the motion

17

remained pending, plaintiff filed an amended complaint (Dkt. No. 20). Defendant asked to

18

withdraw its motion to dismiss without prejudice to a new motion directed at the pleadings or a

19

motion to compel arbitration (Dkt. No. 26). Defendant’s motion to dismiss is DENIED AS MOOT

20

without prejudice to a new motion.

21
22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: December 7, 2016.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE