Grace et al v. Alaska Air Group, Inc. et al
Filing
18
ORDER REQUESTING SURREPLY AND CONTINUING HEARING, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 5 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Order to Show Cause Prohibiting the Acquisition of Virgin America, Inc. by Defendants Alaska Air Group, Inc. and Alaska Airlines, Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 10/19/2016 08:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. William Alsup.. Signed by Judge Alsup on 10/6/16. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/6/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
DANIEL GRACE, et al.,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
Plaintiffs,
12
13
14
v.
ALASKA AIR GROUP, INC., et al.,
ORDER REQUESTING
SURREPLY AND
CONTINUING HEARING
Defendant.
/
15
16
No. C 16-05165 WHA
Defendants object to reply evidence submitted in support of plaintiffs’ motion for a
17
preliminary injunction of the merger of two airlines. Among the objectionable reply
18
declarations is a report from plaintiffs’ expert providing, for the first time, sworn support for
19
plaintiffs’ HHI calculations, even though the analysis had been solicited and completed before
20
the filing of the complaint and without identifying the expert in Rule 26 disclosures.
21
Defendants seek to strike the untimely and undisclosed reply evidence.
22
Rather than strike the untimely evidence, defendants may file a surreply by OCTOBER
23
12 AT NOON. The surreply and any supporting declarations shall be limited to direct rebuttal of
24
the evidence raised for the first time in plaintiffs’ reply declarations. Any extraneous material
25
will not be considered. The hearing on the motion for a preliminary injunction is hereby
26
CONTINUED to WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 19 AT 8:00 A.M.
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 6, 2016.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?