Grace et al v. Alaska Air Group, Inc. et al

Filing 23

ORDER DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY GIL D. MESSINA by Hon. William Alsup denying 21 Motion for Pro Hac Vice.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 DANIEL GRACE, et al., 10 Plaintiffs, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 9 12 13 v. ALASKA AIR GROUP, INC., et al., ORDER DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY GIL D. MESSINA Defendants. / 14 15 No. C 16-05165 WHA The pro hac vice application of Attorney Gil D. Messina (Dkt. No. 21) is DENIED for 16 failing to comply with Local Rule 11-3. The local rule requires that an applicant certify that “he 17 or she is an active member in good standing of the bar of a United States Court or of the highest 18 court of another State or the District of Columbia, specifying such bar” (emphasis added). 19 Filling out the pro hac vice form from the district court website such that it only identifies the 20 state of bar membership — such as “the bar of New Jersey” — is inadequate under the local rule 21 because it fails to identify a specific court. While the application fee does not need to be paid 22 again, the application cannot be processed until a corrected form is submitted. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 Dated: October 18, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?