Doe v. County of Sonoma et al
Filing
23
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 2/9/2017. Signed by Judge James Donato on 1/26/2017. (jdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/26/2017) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/27/2017: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (lrcS, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
JOHN DOE,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Case No.16-cv-05195-JD
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
v.
COUNTY OF SONOMA, et al.,
Defendants.
12
13
At 10:00 am on Thursday, January 26, 2017, the Court held an initial case management
14
conference and motion to dismiss hearing, both of which were noticed for this date. Pro se
15
plaintiff John Doe, who is proceeding under a pseudonym, did not appear. Plaintiff had made no
16
prior request to be excused from the hearing or to reschedule the hearing date. His failure to
17
appear is unexcused and violates the Local Rules and the Court’s standing order for civil cases.
18
19
20
Doe is ordered to show cause why the Court should not dismiss this case for failure to
prosecute. His written response is due by February 9, 2017.
If Doe intends to pursue this case, he may wish to consult a manual the court has adopted
21
to assist pro se litigants in presenting their case. This manual, and other free information, is
22
available online at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/proselitigants.
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 26, 2017
25
26
27
28
JAMES DONATO
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?